English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Matthew 27: 24 -25
When Pilate saw that he was getting nowhere, but that instead an uproar was starting. he took water and washed his hands in front of the crowd. " I am innocent of this man's blood," he said, " It is your repsonsibility!"
All the people answered, " Let his blood be on us and on our chilidren!"

I just thought it has to do something with it.

2007-02-04 06:11:15 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

17 answers

There is a link between the two, just not the one that you're suggesting.

The people who were getting Christianity going were very concerned about getting people away from Judaism and were willing to say and write just about anything to do so. If the bulk of their first converts had been Greek, it would have been Greeks saying that line.

Later anti-semitism used those same early Christian texts as justification and it spiraled out of control from there.

2007-02-04 06:23:53 · answer #1 · answered by The angels have the phone box. 7 · 1 0

The Jews were just an easy scapegoat for Hitler to point his finger at during the post-WWI decade when Germany was bankrupt. Also, he didn't just blame Jews, he blamed blacks, homosexuals, gypsies, etc. Anyway, it was the Romans who killed Jesus, not the Jews. Even if the Jews did, why should modern-day Jews bear the guilt and shame? Modern-day Germans don't bear the guilt and shame of the Nazis because modern-day Germans had no hand in it (which mabye a small pocket of exceptions). So no, I don't think that the Holocaust has anything to do with it.

2007-02-04 06:18:10 · answer #2 · answered by Steady As She Goes 2 · 3 0

human beings say yet they don't look to be being bodily violent. tremendous damage can come devoid of the violence. Sexual infant abusers frequently are not physcially violent. yet they deeply violate. They "love" their toddlers into finished oblivion. We suggested NO. And NO means NO. they gained't call themselves Jews in any type. should you have self belief they have a sparkling faith, they won't be able to use our call. merely then will they ultimately be including a sparkling (or redeveloped) faith to the international. For 2000 years Christians have not respected letting Jews stay AS JEWS. they have tried FORCING us to operate Jesus to our faith. Now they do it with assistance from calling themselves us. it is really merely in the near previous that Christianty's stepped forward geninue appreciate for us. yet, now it truly is the make or destroy deal. Will additionally they "get" this? ================== To different Jewish persons: i'm questioning if it truly is time all of us were given more effective at verbalizing the specifics "one liner" ideas of anti-semitism & began pointing them out, so human beings can ultimately see what even some good persons don't realize they're questioning. i do not imagine human beings understand what anti-semitism sounds like previous the intense. i ask your self as a Jewish community if we've been frozen from doing adequate -- because we are nevertheless soaking up the previous & attempting now to not "bypass there". ============ Cool So your agreeing they're purpose is popping Jews into Christians. So, calling themselves Jews is a lie. They weren't "Judah's for Jesus" decrease back then. They were describe extra as "now no longer Jews - exploring a sparkling faith, or perplexed Jews exploring a sparkling faith" until eventually they followed a popularity for themselves, Christians. I guess they were proud of their new call.

2016-11-02 07:33:13 · answer #3 · answered by gilbert 4 · 0 0

Nope. That's just a handy excuse for stomping somebody else down so's you can feel up.

In Hitler's case it was because he got aced out of an art scholarship by a more talented youngster who just happened to be Jewish. Made Adolph madder than a hornet and he decided it wasn't his lack of talent, but the other guy's Jewish connection (cause everybody knows that they own all the banks and its the banks that hold the scholarship money). He used a prevailing nastiness (anti-Semitism) to absolve himself of being less than perfect. Then when he got to be top dog, he figured, "What a great time to avenge myself on those creeps who stole my rightful place in the art world. After all, I was gonna be the next Michaelangelo." And we all know where THAT led.

2007-02-04 06:19:21 · answer #4 · answered by Granny Annie 6 · 1 0

The Holocaust has nothing to do with this. The Holocaust, while undeniably one of the most horrific events to happen in the history of the world, was just that: an event. If the Holocaust could be linked to the Jewish people allowing Jesus to be executed, then there would be more events similar to it, or at least a vague chain of mild to terrible unfortunate events from then to now. That is my take on it.

2007-02-04 06:17:57 · answer #5 · answered by Iamnotarobot (former believer) 6 · 4 1

No. The Holocaust was a growth of evil in the form of fear and mass hypnotism, whereby evil overshadowed the good in people, and the people accepted the evil as good, but it was not retribution for the crucifixion.

2007-02-04 06:53:18 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

No. Nazi Ideology is based on Alfred Rosenberg. Try GOOGLEing it. It is based on a racist, secular ideology that is based on flawed science. The Jews were made the scapegoats for everything that was wrong with Germany at the time.

2007-02-04 06:15:59 · answer #7 · answered by great gig in the sky 7 · 4 0

Understand what your saying, but the Holocaust can be attributed
mans nasty nature mixed with entirely too much power given to
a real living monster (regular old pumpkin head)

2007-02-04 06:18:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I really don't believe that to be true.
The Holocaust was brought about by the works of Satan through Adolph Hitler attempting to eradicate God's chosen people.

2007-02-04 06:17:45 · answer #9 · answered by drg5609 6 · 2 0

No. Hitler just missed his medication for a few years and the mental hospitals were too scared to accept him. He was jut deranged. And apparently Jesus was a jew.

2007-02-04 06:21:32 · answer #10 · answered by unclassified_yeti_smurf 1 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers