kept alive, in excruciatingly painful life conditions? until death 'naturally' occurred???
I know - you are saying that an animal's life is 'less' important (spiritually) than human's . . . therefore, putting an animal out of their painful misery (killing them via artificial means) is acceptable, whereas, humans must 'endure' physical horrors??? until natural death releases them?
What do you think? or believe? or feel about this???
2007-02-04
04:13:13
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
OK 'fish' - here's one for you to ponder . . .
Hitler utilized 'genocide' . . . not euthanasia.
2007-02-04
04:22:53 ·
update #1
Thank you "iamcatholic" for your insightful (according to your chosen dogmatic beliefs) response.
I wonder if those of your 'faith' apply this belief re: sacredness of the 'gift' of life? when enlisting in the armed services - agreeing to end human life (usually in a gruesome manner) in the interest of protecting and defending some political agenda?
Moral elitism is an amazing reality, and one which I hope does not hinder my egress (quickly and painlessly) from this physical realm. . .
Peace to you . . .
2007-02-05
06:02:22 ·
update #2