is it possible for machine gun fire to penetrate armor?

Answer 1

It all depends on what kind of armor. Body armor? The armor of a tank? And what kind of ammunition and gun. A SAW machine gun that fires 5.56mm? Am M2 that fires .50 cal.? You have to be way more specific.

Answer 2

There is a constant battle between armor and armor-piercing ammo.

There is no ammo that a man can wear that is totally 100% bullet proof.

As far as tanks, the most heavily armored vehicles on the battle field, both the ceramic armor developed by the British and the reactive armor developed by Israel, neither can stand up to the Vulcan cannon (machine gun) of an A-10 loaded with DU rounds.

The best defense is not to get shot in the first place.

Answer 3

the enormous difference is length on my own, they're thoroughly an similar ingredient. A device gun, through definition, is only an automated gun, in spite of cartridge variety, explosive or otherwise. There are 2 top calibre sizes. 12.7mm (or .50) or 20mm (.seventy 8 calibre) reckoning on which usa you're in. there is element out of explosive tip shells. it would not count if the shell is explosive or no longer, the calibre is the defining function. there is yet another function, if the dimensions is over the prescribed limits, that in common words makes it a cannon. The spitfire had Autocannons which, unsuprisingly, are automated cannons. To be sparkling, a gun with a calibre of better than 20mm that needs manually reloading after each and each and every shot is a cannon. A gun with a calibre of better than 20mm that would fireplace better than one round without guide reloading is an autocannon. an similar is asserted to outline the enormous difference between a gun and device gun. On an exciting note, the spitfire's cannons fired 20mm shells at 3600 rounds in retaining with minute at a speed of 580 metres in retaining with 2d. someone pronounced the A-10 further up, that fires 30mm rounds at 1067 metres in retaining with 2d. apparently, the flinch on the A-10 is so tremendous that the pilot can't fireplace for better than 2 seconds or the plane will actually come to a end in mid air. in case you imagine thats quick, Sandia Labs have stepped forward an electro magnetic pulse gun that fires metal slugs at 33866 metres in retaining with 2d, scary. so that you may want to respond to your unique question, a device gun and an autocannon are an similar ingredient, a cannon only has a better calibre. in addition, a gun and cannon are an similar except for calibre length.

Answer 4

Depends on the machine gun, the ammo used, and the thickness of the armor

Answer 5

Depends on the Armor thickness and type of Machine Gun. I have used a .50 caliber M2 on BMPs and BDRMs. It worked quite well. A lot of this is according to a bunch of variables. Also, one must consider the type of ammunition used.

Answer 6

As everyone has pointed out... it's a simple matter of bullet vs armor.

Ma Deuce (M2 .50 aircooled machine gun) can penetrate the armor of some AFV /IFV.

Answer 7

Of course. It mostly depends on the bullet. Where do you think Armor Piercing Rounds come from? Different calibers, different gun powders, different bullet slugs, different metals, and different size barrels all have effect how destructive bullets are.

Answer 8

Yes, if the gun is loaded with armor piercing rounds.

Answer 9

Hardened steel cores for light armor, depleted uranium for heavy armor. The A-10 uses depleted uranium for tanks. Not used in submachineguns (pistol-caliber bullets in handheld machineguns) because they don't have enough power.

Answer 10

Fifty caliber armour piercing rounds could possibly penetrate armour, depending on it's thickness!