http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AqcCEfi7pZ9hmlbjy6ixp8_sy6IX?qid=20070204061405AApggcy
Why are people assuming an atheist took the cross down when the article stated it was not? Why are people assuming *I* went to this chapel? This has nothing to do with any experience of mine.
If you take the time to answer, take the time to read the pertinent information so you do not look like a fool!
Thank you to those who did read the article in question and offered an intelligent response.
.
2007-02-04 01:36:19 · 17 answers · asked by Chickyn in a Handbasket 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Julia -- this is one of the answers from that question: "They should determine that its a historical monument and leave it how it is. What do atheists have against our countries history and tradition. "
2007-02-04 01:59:53 · update #1
Right you are, Invader Zim!
.
2007-02-04 02:13:42 · update #2
First, you should not expect people to go to your designated site before they should answer your question. Put your question into a brief point of information so Answerer's can reply and move on to other Questions. To get upset over people not obeying your instructions is not helpful to you or others who enjoy answering questions.
As for the cross matter, I did read the entire article, and the point is, it's up to the school and it's members to decide whether the cross should be in the chapel, or not.
A chapel is basically a quiet, set-aside place, for meditation and/or prayer. It should not be an advertisement or support for any religion. The point is to discharge all thoughts of the World, to commune with spirit and selfless aspects of ones being. The less selfishly conflicting items to distract anyone from their personal communications while in the Chapel, the better. Let it be a place--quiet, set apart-- and those who come there will leave knowing the reason for coming back whenever they can...to commune with the Spirit that lives in all mankind...that spark of life, called by many names, the Creator of the Universe, the God who gives life to all, answers to anyone who opens their heart and their mind, and lifts the veil of humanness, even for a single moment.
2007-02-04 02:18:47 · answer #1 · answered by TexasStar 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
>>>Why are people assuming an atheist took the cross down when the article stated it was not?>>>
Who was assuming it was an atheist?
I just went and read all the answers to the question you mention.
Not a single one of them asserted that an atheist took down the cross. Not one.
Take the time to read the answers -- without reading things INTO them -- so you do not look like a fool.
.
2007-02-04 01:54:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Lots of people don't read links. It's probably better to paraphrase the article briefly, then ask your question. No one looks like a fool for refusing to read a long article, if the questioner can't be bothered to paraphrase.
2007-02-04 01:43:30 · answer #3 · answered by cmw 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
some times the question is to long and I do not get 1/2 way through it + I do not like opening web pages I do not know but I always try and give an honest answer to what I have read.
2007-02-04 01:43:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
i imagine someone new will shine between now on the international cup.. for the Euros i ought to %. a million) Hart 2( Richards 3) Cahil 4) Dawson 4) Baines defence midfield 5) RCM Gerrard 6) LCM Parker CAM Wiltshire RAM Walcott LAM youthful ST Bent causes i not in any respect positioned Terry, Rio and Rooney. i in my opinion think of their over-rated. and that i not in any respect Lampard in because Gerrard and Lampard cant play contained in the crew. we ought to continuously stop picking platying cos of names and %. them cos of skills. look what number huge names change into in Ghana and Germany?
2016-11-02 07:07:19 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yean and they need to, I read all the details and i clicked the article you listed and read about 3/4 of it.
Especially my questions ill ask and the details are so important, usually its militant christians and militant atheists who dont read the details
dont sweat it
2007-02-04 01:40:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yeah, As much as it pains me sometimes, I always read the questions before answering.
2007-02-04 01:41:42 · answer #7 · answered by Tori M 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
72
2007-02-04 01:39:02 · answer #8 · answered by Im a killer 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
this is a metaquestion referencing another question referencing an article.
The short answer is no. People read the header.
2007-02-04 02:11:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I answered this question. Maybe you should read all the answers before you blast the community.
2007-02-04 01:41:25 · answer #10 · answered by J. 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋