English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

After watching this interview on FOX NEWS, which I will admit was highly religious bias, but nonetheless had this Christian guy has children and very young adults filmed denouncing Atheism. And he goes further saying, which is actually something similar to what Richard Dawkin's said, that the parents are indoctrinating their children and it is abusive.

Are they serious lol? This is asking that parents shouldn't be parents and lead their children in ways and manners that they think is beneficial for their growth and development, which is their right AND duty if it is within the natural laws. What should we let the government become the parents and raise up children, take the power out of the parents and give it to the state? Many religious people would not want their children to go to public school since it teaches things they don't agree with and indoctrinates them into a secular prospective, but they can't without legal trouble and this is unconstitutional. I'm not of a religion btw

2007-02-04 00:12:01 · 12 answers · asked by Kilroy 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Why put down parents for being parents. Like any parent they raise their children into whatever belief they have, should we let are children not have foundations that we see necessary for them and let the cultural prospective at the time decide what they are going to belief, our society? Now speaking against any type of teaching that doesn’t value and protect the sanctity of life is bad.

2007-02-04 00:13:04 · update #1

12 answers

One only has to look at the quality of state run public schools now to see its failure.

2007-02-04 00:18:15 · answer #1 · answered by beek 7 · 0 0

This Richard Dawkins Ideals of complaining how Parents raise their child is satan way of getting the younger generation away from God, They refuse to let Christianity be taught in schools, But little do they know that evolution is taught in schools, & Evolution is a type of religion, & many do not know this, But I saw this on the NEWS a few months back, They are now making it mandatory for children to be taught islam in our schools, thou few it may be now, The old saying you give satan an inch & he will take a mile. My Children was rasied up in a Christian home, They are now on their own, & little did they know back then, that some advise I gave them as a father & they may not like it at the time, They are now faced with that problem with there kids, Both of my daughters, is married & have a family of their own, & both of them has said daddy we know now why you taught us certain things.

2007-02-04 00:30:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I wonder if people like Dawkins are really Christians. They believe that God made a mistake when he gave a child to atheist parents. That's seems like heresy.

Atheists can teach their kids anything. If Dawkins and other really believed in God, then they would believe that God has the power to reach both the parents and the child. They believe that the parents are more powerful than God. That definetly is a heresy in the Christian religion.

If you want to be a Christain, you can't tell God He isn't doing His job right, that's how Lucifer became Satan.

2007-02-04 00:25:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

To everything there is a season
And we are in the end days Pray for yourself and your family
When government injects into our religious beliefs
It has become a sad day
Zealosts rebuked Jesus
What's the difference with this
All the same
Who cares that we can put a man on the moon
What about his soul/

2007-02-04 00:20:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Parents are supposed to raise and guide their children in manners that are beneficial to their spiritual growth and development. Atheism should be denounced. God wants us to raise our children to be good Christians people who obey His laws. We are not to follow what the rest of this sinful world is doing, but go the way God is going and guiding us.

Romans 12:2 And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.

Psalms 132:12 If thy children will keep my covenant and my testimony that I shall teach them, their children shall also sit upon thy throne for evermore.

Parents today are homeschooling their children because they do not want their child to be contaminated with what the teachers are teaching their kids. I coming those parents for taking a stand against the government and saying. "this is my child and I will teach them the morals and the rules that God taught me". Praise the Lord!

This secular world is going to hell in a hand basket and I am not going to be one of them, nor are my children.

2007-02-04 00:26:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

the factor you're making approximately no longer asking regardless of if or no longer identity is a technology is a necessary factor. identity isn't a technology. It has offered relatively no autonomous examine that has stemmed from testable hypotheses. in fact, lots of the scientific community is familiar with identity for what it relatively is--a repackaging of creationism without the capital G. With that fact out of ways, identity does strengthen some stable questions for evolution, maximum of that have been spoke back with scientific information. Irreducible complexity, for one, has been no longer in basic terms struck down, yet completed so in a courtroom of regulation. however the issue-unfastened guideline of identity--that there is a supernatural writer that led to or publications "all of it"--is a thoroughly untestable concept. and it relatively is in basic terms no longer testable till some IDer available has discovered some consistent, valid, stable thank you to purpose for the supernatural. So regardless of if identity can or does compete with or oppose evolutionary concept, or is compatable with it, would not relatively matter. simply by fact the incontrovertible fact that it is not scientific potential that there is not any scientific validity to it.

2016-10-01 10:01:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, the purpose of parents is to indoctrinate their children to believe in the parent's social and religious beliefs. and it is the children's purpose to rebel against those beliefs.

This is the way culture and belief continues and evolves.

2007-02-04 00:20:38 · answer #7 · answered by whatotherway 7 · 0 0

Actually, I let my children make up their own minds. I will teach them manners, respect for other people, self respect, the value of money, to take responsibility for their own actions and to be kind...all practical things they can use in the real world. I will not force them to believe what I believe. I want them to be confident, strong and able to think for themselves. I want them to choose their own paths not become clones of me! They may want to be hindus or Christians or buddhists, it's up to them to decide. They are people not posessions ad they have the right to choose their own beliefs.

2007-02-04 00:24:21 · answer #8 · answered by Velvet_Goth 5 · 0 0

there are parents in middle-eastern countries that "teach" their children it is alright to strap a bomb to their chest and go blow themselves up to kill as many people as possible as being a GOOD thing to do. what do you think about letting THOSE parents "indoctrinate" their children how they see fit?

and ok, to whoever says: "parents can teach their kids whatever they want," please try to think about what you are saying.

2007-02-04 00:16:29 · answer #9 · answered by Dashes 6 · 0 0

I think the best answer is to home school your children. It is on the increase largely because of these issues, is completely leagal, and supported by most communities.

2007-02-04 00:18:59 · answer #10 · answered by oldguy63 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers