English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

For instance I know that they are constantly harping on about the war on terrorism,and some of their worries and points are valid but are delivered with such a clear vitriolic hatred of the US that I can't deal with them. So can they ever support America? When the first terrorists start suicide bombing targets in the US again,which should start right after the election of a democrat who stops all anti terrorism measures,will the libs want to fight back then?

2007-02-04 00:09:50 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

It's in the religion section because the terrorists despise us on religious grounds,and for the guy commenting about depleted uranium rounds I sure wish you knew what you were talking about,too bad you bought into hype and falsehoods,I say that as someone who has worked with depleted uranium rounds,end of story. Note the word depleted,you can get more radiation from a dental X ray

2007-02-04 00:26:34 · update #1

17 answers

They will say that they support america when they know that the majority of the country does. They are the biggest problem in the country. I am conservative, and I supported the war in the beginning, against my better judgement. I figured it would pay for itself with oil. Other than that I didn't see any benefit to going in. You get the weapons remove sadam, and get out. Let it collapse from within, who cares. It isn't in americas interest to build democracies at the expense of ours.
Back to liberals. Now that the war is out of control, and we need out, no one can step up and say we want out. The liberals that never want to defend the interests of america, have created an atmosphere where if you say something about policy you have to agree with them. Since they never want to defend the country, they never agree with us. That is our biggest problem. There is no compromise on their part, and they never take the right stance from the start.. Therefore, we can no longer say anything bad about our leaders without being a Bush basher.

2007-02-04 00:20:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Maybe you need to do more research and not listen to pundifs.

The Republican Spin machine paints all Democrats as liberals.

The Actual Truthof the matter is that both Democrats & Republicans are actually both moderates. Thats how our country generally maintains the Status Quo. There is very little change in our Govenment regardless of which party is in power.

Just as with every decision. There are Pros & Cons to all of them.

If you are worried about Terrorism then you are merely a mindless coward. The democrats are Americans just like the rest of the citizens of this nation. If anything they are the ones who will enact and enforce policies that will actually protect America.

1. What has the Bush (conservative agenda) done to secure our wide open southern border?

2. Was it the liberals who tried to turn over all our ports to Dubai a renown Terrorist enabvling nation? No that would be the Bush administration again. (Liberals stopped it)

3. How was it that decided to stop chasing Terrorists in Afghanistan and Pakistan (Known Hiding place of Osama Bin Ladin & Birth Place of Al Queada) That again would be your beloved Bush (conservative movement)

4. Who decided to scrap the War on Terrorism and Invade Iraq. (There was no terrorists in Iraq or weapons of mass destruction)
Once again your evangelical Muslim haters trying to convert or strike up a new crusade. The conservatives

5. What did that Illegal war create? A destabilized Middle East where now Iraq will be ruled by a Shiite Government (Same as Iran) These are actually supporters of Terror. Brought to you by the Bush administration.

6. Why do you think Saddam Hussein was our ally prior to Bush Sr taking a Kuwatii payoff of oil wells to send our troops to Iraq the 1st time. Because Saddam was Kicking Iran's azz for the US.

I bet you beleived Bush's constant rant of the War in Iraq is the War on terror too huh. WRONG! It rages on to try and cover his mistake of going there in the first place.

George Bush is President of The United States
(despite his stealing the election with the help of his fathers supreme court judges and his governor Brother in florida)

As President he will get enormous media coverage to spew any ridiculous nonsense he wants. Just because he says something doesn't make it True. According to Bush the War was over 4 years ago. This guy hasn't been right on anything.

How do you cut taxes when we are spending a huge amopunt of our teasury (100s of Billions of dollars) on this war. If you're not collecting money then where is it coming from to pay this enormous military tab?

WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE!

THE REPUBLICANS DON'T EVEN SUPPORT BUSH ANYMORE!

GET A CLUE!
Now go research politics for yourself. Find out whats real and what is spin. Its people like you that helped the rise of Nazi Germany (listening to all the Hitler propaganda and believing it)

2007-02-04 00:45:47 · answer #2 · answered by Dr. Ackmadia 2 · 2 1

Why aren't you disapointed that the terrorists even made it into the United States when out President had previous warning that we might be attacked?
Doesn't that concern you? That perhaps the President isn't doing his job?
The Liberals aren't supporting America?
Who was in office last Bill Clinton? He BALLANCED THE BUDGET>! Look, Clinton may have got some head, but he didn't **** the world!
What are we in debt for now trillions of dollars? Who is going to pay for that? How much harder are we as Americans going to have to work to pay that off because of the work he didn't do?

I can't believe this...

2007-02-04 00:52:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Let's get something straight. It was an ULTRA-LIBERAL Dem named Roosevelt, who was so liberal he married his first cousin and turned America into a socialist state. He commissioined the A-Bomb.

It was a Dem named Truman who ordered two of those A Bombs dropped on Japan.

It was a Dem named Johnson who esclated the small group of advisors sent into by a Rep named Eisenhower into full fledged warfare in a place called Vietnam.

Reps talk big, but it's always the DEMS who do things and when they do them, they do them hog wild.

2007-02-04 00:27:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

worry monger, you utilize an appropriate demonstrate screen call. you apart from might are making statements that are organic hypothesis, in basic terms like our President. Who in our u . s . would not combat if an enemy ever relatively landed on our seashores? no longer the BS approximately them being in our lower back yards if we don't run all over the globe attempting to wipe out an enemy we gained't even discover in Iraq. The republican base is in basic terms too prepared to have faith all the crap approximately shrink and run and the Dems are going to tax you to dying. Leaving Iraq isn't reducing and working, it relatively is extra like a corporation determination, do no longer throw stable funds after undesirable, be attentive to whilst to shrink your loses. As a republican that would desire to be certainly comprehensible. fact, ultimately this conflict is going to could be paid for, whilst it happens, who will you blame, whoever is in potential, or President Bush for putting us into this enormous debt? this may be puzzling to appreciate yet others as nicely republicans do help this u . s ., this is why you notice a lot dissent and opposition to the President.

2016-10-01 10:01:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Lets see, it was a Liberal who gave us Civil Right.
It was those Liberal Factory workers who gave us the 8 hr work week, Health Insurance and Unimployment Insureance.
It was a Liberal who Lobbied for Seat Belts
It was Liberals who set up health standards for the food you eat
It is Liberal that have Lobbied for most of the defenses of the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

But I guess for Conservatives that's not supporting America, is it?

When we were attacked the Whole country was behind finding those who did it and dealing with them, but when it came to Iraq, there were those of us liberals who raised questions that to this day have never been fully answered.

On DU, from the World Health Organization:
Following conflict, levels of DU contamination in food and drinking water might be detected in affected areas even after a few years. This should be monitored where it is considered there is a reasonable possibility of significant quantities of DU entering the ground water or food chain.
Where justified and possible, clean-up operations in impact zones should be undertaken if there are substantial numbers of radioactive projectiles remaining and where qualified experts deem contamination levels to be unacceptable. If high concentrations of DU dust or metal fragments are present, then areas may need to be cordoned off until removal can be accomplished. Such impact sites are likely to contain a variety of hazardous materials, in particular unexploded ordnance. Due consideration needs to be given to all hazards, and the potential hazard from DU kept in perspective.
Small children could receive greater exposure to DU when playing in or near DU impact sites. Their typical hand-to-mouth activity could lead to high DU ingestion from contaminated soil. Necessary preventative measures should be taken.
Disposal of DU should follow appropriate national or international recommendations.

So .................................... who cleaned up the DU from the 1st Gulf war?

How do you limit your exposure when you are in a war zone?

Your question was wearing a religious mask, but its just another Neo-Con rant

2007-02-04 03:52:02 · answer #6 · answered by Black Dragon 5 · 0 1

Go look at pictures of what the ied's are doing to our soldiers and pictures of the suffering of the iraqi civillians.Pictures are worth a thousand words. Plus that war isn't even justified. Now if they started suicide bombing over here, that's a different story.

btw you also need to look at what the depleted uranium rounds we are using in iraq and afghanistan are doing to the people. Their children are beibg born with extreme genetic mutations. Please look at those pictures and tell me that a human being needs to go through that.

2007-02-04 00:19:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

okay this question is ignorant on so many levels. im an extreme liberal and its not that i dont support america its that i recognize that we are extremely faulted and make retarded decisions as well as the fact that we have a jackass for a president. also americans tend to be extremely ungrateful, ignorant to how their nation's decisions affect the world around them, and have put faith in a lousy president for two terms in a row. i have friends that are conservatives so its kind of weird hearing you speak about us as if we arent humans...just because we disagree with you doesnt mean we dont support america. i dont support most decisions america makes but im still american.

2007-02-04 00:20:17 · answer #8 · answered by Gone, Gone, Gone. 4 · 1 1

I consider it an insult that I supposedly don't love and support my country just because I won't support the buffoon occupying the White House who could give a crap about our troops. Today he's at the Superbowl.

2007-02-04 00:15:56 · answer #9 · answered by Debra D 7 · 1 1

Liberals do support America and the rights of all Americans. That is why conservatives hate them. The cons want to ignore the constitution and just do whatever they please in the name of patriotism...it is a sham and now the repugs are paying the price.

2007-02-04 00:15:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers