English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If you put all 4 of these groups together in a forum room to talk about questions and to answer other people's questions about life and what is the truth , who do you think will win in a argument?

2007-02-03 20:20:47 · 25 answers · asked by tmblife 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

25 answers

It doesn't matter how it ends ... each will go away believing they won the debate.

2007-02-03 20:25:34 · answer #1 · answered by MyPreshus 7 · 4 1

The Christians would be the first to seek converts from the Jews, and try to form an alliance to take out the Muslims. The Jews would be reluctant, considering the Christians as bad as the Muslims, and would play it neutral. The Muslims, thinking the reluctance of the Jews was evidence that they were near converting, would seek to convert the Jews. The Jews would then ally with Christians and at least knock Islam out of the picture.

Atheists, angry that the Theists were judging each other, would enter the picture and judge all of them, and then the Christians would duke it out with them. The non believers would side with the Atheists and the weak Christians would convert to, and revive, Islam. The true Christians, meanwhile, would be caught up in the rapture and everyone else would continue arguing and converting each other.

2007-02-03 20:38:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

okay....let's see.....let's imagine there are 2 in each group.....

The believers would outnumber the non-believer (Christians, Muslims, Jews ) against the Atheist and whatever other Non Believers, so the non-believers would be put in a corner to fight each other. The Atheist would be firmer in their non-belief, so Non Believers would get clobbered. The Atheist, then being the only one left in the non-believer group would be clobbered by the believers.

So we are left with the believers.

The Jews wouldn't care because they feel see themselves as an oppressed group so would probably expect to be clobbered, anyway.

The Christians wouldn't care because they would only care about the salvation of God, not the salvation from a religious argument.

Now everyone else would fear the Muslims out of their misunderstanding of the Islamic religion.

The Muslims will win.

2007-02-03 20:30:41 · answer #3 · answered by Nocturne_in_G_Major 2 · 1 0

I do not perceive the difference between atheist and non believers. Talk about life(?) how? As in evolution or as in religious creation. Talk about truth? what truth? God etc or the uncertainty principle. Or about anything. Logical arguments go hand in hand with proof. Creation according to religion has no proof while there is overwhelming evidence of the big bang. Same goes for the concept of God. Religion has no proof while there is overwhelming evidence against. From the point of view of an atheist an argument does not exist. As to everything else I will go with the atheist. the most brilliant minds of humanity are atheists.

2007-02-03 20:41:36 · answer #4 · answered by The Stainless Steel Rat 5 · 0 0

Muslims
http://www.sultan.org

2007-02-03 20:38:35 · answer #5 · answered by Uthman A 5 · 1 0

Christians

2016-05-24 02:21:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No one should 'win'. In a forum, the aim is to share knowledge. You explain misconceptions and answer questions about your religion, and vice versa. All the religions aren't that much different. You'll find, if you research all the religions, that all of them are similar in their takes on life and truths. Those who do not believe in God cannot deny that there is a being more powerful than us humans, who created the lands, skies and seas.

In inter-faith dialogues, confrontations and arguments should be avoided. It is not a matter of who out-argues who, it is about promoting peace and harmony to the people in the world. Peace can only be achieved through mutual understanding.

May God Bless you all.

2007-02-03 20:31:09 · answer #7 · answered by sistergalactic 2 · 0 1

Muslim, why? Because we have the most convincing proof, the finality of God's word, and rational person would be able to see that after being exposed.

And as for whos more educated.

The Muslims in America are the HIGHEST educated minority.

2007-02-03 20:53:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Spiritual matters cannot be decided by argument.

A Christian who was faithful enough to be able to work miracles like the Apostles would win by showing God's power, but there's no guarantee that God would let him work a miracle just to impress the others.

2007-02-03 20:28:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

A non-believer is one that does notv accept the religionist's staements because they are not -never- supported by the power of logic, nor the sytrength of reasoning based on scientific discoveries. The belivers' only tool is a book written by ill-rasoning and often unemployable people whoimpose their crude views on gullible people and enslave their intelligence.The so-called{holy?] books are nothing but sheaves of printing paper and if they are cosigned to fire or oceans, no harm will ever come to human race. Have I said enough to make you think? Many thanks.

2007-02-03 20:35:24 · answer #10 · answered by polymath 1 3 · 0 1

No one because everyone that would debate would be too stuck in their own ways to even budge. Atheists would talk about narrowminded people, christians would talk about jesus, Muslims would talk about allah, jews would talk about god, and non-believers wouldn't think the fourm was real.

2007-02-03 20:26:46 · answer #11 · answered by Mo L 3 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers