only if your mom was bobbing on the knob while they were driving.
2007-02-03 19:13:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
It relies upon on in case you have self assurance interior the death penalty. in my opinion very lots have self assurance interior the death penalty and the actuality that that's a super preventative device. Our prisons our over populated and our courts structures if flooded with extreme crimes simply by fact our regulations have become so lax. there is not any clarification for offenders to concern punishment or the repercussions of crimes. Our penitentiary gadget supplies you nutrition, medical care, safeguard, guidance, or perhaps funds specifically circumstances. If the criminal has a history of driving under the impact then sure, i've got self assurance the death penalty is warranted. The death penalty is meant to be a deterrent, violent crimes proceed to take place simply by fact the is not any concern of the justice gadget.
2016-09-28 09:52:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by benisek 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. People who actually commit murder rarely get the death penalty. There is not enough room on death row as there is. Harsher penalities such as confiscation of the vehicles and a breathalizer attached to the ignition is more appropriate, as well as drug and alcohol counseling and jail time or probation. The laws are getting tougher all the time. We don't need the death penalty, we just need for the current laws to be enforced.
2007-02-03 19:18:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you kill or seriously injure another person because of an alcohol or drug-related violation, you can be convicted of vehicular manslaughter or assault, carrying a fine of up to $5,000 and a jail term of up to seven years.
If you are convicted of two DWI violations, both resulting in physical injury traffic crashes, your license will be revoked permanently.
If you drive while your license is suspended or revoked, you face a mandatory fine of $200 to $1000, and a mandatory jail term or probation. If impaired or intoxicated at the time of arrest, the maximum mandatory fine is $5,000, and the vehicle may be seized and forfeited.
Liability insurance may not cover the cost of injuries and damage from a traffic crash. You could be sued for thousands of dollars. You'd also find it difficult and expensive to buy liability insurance for several years.
In addition to fines and surcharges, you could also face very expensive legal fees.
You could have a criminal record, making it more difficult to get a job or advance your career.
The worst consequence, however, is death or injury to yourself or someone else. It may be hard for you to imagine that you could be involved in a fatal or injury traffic crash while driving impaired or intoxicated - but it happens to thousands of drivers every year who also thought it could never happen to them.
Alcohol and drugs give you a false sense of confidence. You are not likely to worry about the consequences while you already are impaired or intoxicated. The time to consider them, and how to avoid them, is before you are under the influence.
I think these are better solutions than the death penalty, because we are not GOD to control a humans life and death
2007-02-03 20:54:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are wrong. People who today drink and get high is because of theyr childhood. They had a hard childhood because theyr parents weren`t a good example. I am against death penalty because nobody deserves such a destiny. To make a mistake is normal. To make a mistake is human like. So, you are killing a person for making a mistake, for being human?
2007-02-03 19:19:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by silly_bitch 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, you can't go around killing folks for what might happen. They should be sent to a special prison where they have to live in their cars and stay intoxicated while participating in a pay-per-view 24 hrs a day demolition derby.
2007-02-03 19:28:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
They should, if they have caused the death of someone they hit after drinking. A life for a life. No doubt about that.
2007-02-03 20:32:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by yoko_galatian 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
The death penalty is only carried out by inhuman and
brutal governments.
2007-02-03 19:34:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by swenson0 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
so do you drive a car?have you ever drove 1km over the speed limit?if you say no your a liar.so you drove 1 km over the speed limit shouldn't you get the death penalty?speed kills a lot more ppl than drink driving?
2007-02-03 19:23:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by BUSHIDO 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
no i really dont think that they deserve death penalty but if they should happend to hurt someone the should be sentence for a long time let them suffur for their stupid actions lol
2007-02-03 19:20:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jesus said if you break one commandment then you broke all of them.My question is to you have you ever lied if you say no than you just lied so that means we are all guilty of murder and we all deserve the death penalty.do you want to go first or second.this is what you are saying not me
2007-02-03 19:15:57
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋