English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

nuclear power creates nuclear waste.
coal power creates greenhouse gas emissions and open mines.
wind turbines kill low flying birds.
hydroelectric impedes the migration of certain species of fish.
petroleum creates greenhouse gas emissions
these are the big 5, environmentalists wine about them all.
what is the environmentalist solution for energy?
(please, do not tell me SOLAR, i live in the Northwest and Mr. Sun doesn't like to come out and play during the winter.)

2007-02-03 18:20:43 · 3 answers · asked by B0NER 3 in Environment

3 answers

I grew up in the NW...ever notice that it's REALLY green there? That's because of sunlight and (enormous amounts of) rain. Solar permeates through the clouds or you (and all the other Starbucks sippin' treehuggers) would be dead.

2007-02-03 18:27:44 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 1 0

Nuclear energy is proven to be the cleanest source of energy. Also, radioactive waste is not as bad as most people think. A lot of extremely deadly radioactive waste can be handled by people just 10 years after it is taken out of a nuclear reactor. Over time radioactive waste emits less and less radiation.

Companies that make solar panels wont tell you that the panels require a huge amount of energy to make. That is why the electric solar panels are so expensive.

2007-02-04 02:44:43 · answer #2 · answered by a bush family member 7 · 0 0

They want whatever's cheapest for their own use, and they want everyone else to die. Nothing else will ever satisfy them.

2007-02-04 10:48:08 · answer #3 · answered by Dale K 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers