2007-02-03 15:56:16 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Other - Pregnancy & Parenting
Yes. I wanted to have them at the end of winter to the beginning of spring. Fall and beginning of winter are RSV season and it is too cold to get them out for appointments so I didn't want a newborn then. August and September babies are hard for school - August are the youngest in class and September babies are the oldest. I didn't want a holiday - Thanksgiving or Christmas baby. My grandma, mom and myself all share a Halloween birthday and that is not a tradition I wanted to continue. I never wanted a baby with a summer birthday, they have fun at school when it is their birthday and the thought of being 45 pounds heavier in 105 degree weather is not at all appealing. So I ended up with a March 8, Feb 4 (tomorrow!), and Jan 29 babies (but they weren't due until March 12.) The only thing I don't like now is it is still too chilly to ever have an outdoor party. March-May would probably be best but I never thought I could get pregnant on the first try ; )
2007-02-03 16:09:21 · answer #1 · answered by pebble 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wish I could have. I went through the last months of all 3 of my pregnancies during the summer. It was very uncomfortable because of the heat. Having a baby in the spring would be GREAT because you will be able to get out with the baby a lot sooner than if you had the baby around the fall or winter time!
2007-02-04 00:04:14 · answer #2 · answered by Winnie08_98 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
YES! I was living in a very hot climate and did not want to be 8 months pregnant in the dead of summer. I tired to make sure I was not too far along during the hottest months! I run hot anyway and when I'm pregnant I'm boiling all the time. Add 100 degree heat to that? No way!
2007-02-04 00:06:30 · answer #3 · answered by wwhrd 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My first was a total surprise, but I wanted my next to be in the summer. I just think it would be great to have outdoor parties at the pool, etc. Unfortunately, due to miscarriage and trouble conceiving I am back into the winter months! In the end it doesn't matter, I'd just love any date!
2007-02-04 00:02:07 · answer #4 · answered by mom-knows-best 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes because of taxes and also I wanted the baby to be born in the same year I was pregnant, because of the deductable with our insurance.
2007-02-04 00:00:37 · answer #5 · answered by Peggy Pirate 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
With my second daughter, yes, we did. My first daughters birthday, as well as mine, my husbands, my dad and grandma, and several other family members all have birthdays in December and January. Not to mention Christmas!!! So, with our second daughter, we decided to have her in the summer time. Our plan worked and she was born May 20th.
2007-02-04 00:04:16 · answer #6 · answered by pixiestarr44 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, I personally didn't care when my child would be born. My husband and I just decided one month that we were ready to start trying and luckily it happened right away for us.
2007-02-03 23:59:09 · answer #7 · answered by Sakora 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, because I hate being hot and I didn't want to be in the "big" part of my pregnancy during the hot summer months.
2007-02-03 23:58:37 · answer #8 · answered by Marvelissa 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i planned mine 5 years apart on purpose. i did not want 2 kids in diapers. they get along great.
2007-02-04 00:07:07 · answer #9 · answered by catwoman 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Statistically, most children are born in June. I guess it has something to do with fooling around in september or october.
It's true
which isn't such a bad thing. gemini's are decent people.
2007-02-03 23:59:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋