How much time would you waste if you read Richard Dawkins book?

Question

and I do mean WASTE

Answer 1

Reading such an eloquent and erudite author is hardly a waste of time. In fact from an intellectual perspective, time has never been better spent than reading through Dawkins seminal works. His latest book “The God Delusion” is quite a find. He exquisitely lays the case against religious belief, demonstrates the evolutionary developmental mistakes that produced religious belief, and articulates quite masterfully how a secular alternative to religiously oriented morality would be for the betterment of mankind.

Even detractors of Dawkins, though they might contend with some aspect of his worldview, do not ever state that his works are a waste of time. Just because he espouses and expounds upon views that maybe diametrically opposed to your own opinions, doesn’t make him a waste of time. In fact the most judicious usage of ones time is spent exposing oneself to belief systems that are in contrast to ones own. You won’t grow as a person if you merely listen to people who align themselves with whatever you believe to be true.

Answer 2

Actually,it would not be a waste of time. I have an extremely inquisitive mind and read books of all types for learning purposes.Of course,I do not agree with Dawkin's views on God,but you know that old saying "Keep your friends close,but your enemies closer." In order to know the mind of one's enemy, one must keep up to date on what the enemy is saying and doing. Dawkin's outspoken arrogance against God will one day bring him to his knees,figuratively and literally.

Answer 3

I generally don't consider reading a waste of time - even if I don't like or agree with the book. At least you can offer an opinion or enter a debate about it, and know what you're talking about.

That said, I haven't read it, but I might.

Answer 4

not in hardship-free words has David Robertson examine it, he concept it grow to be so tricky he wrote his personal e book questioning it. This e book (revealed via CFP) is named "The Dawkins Letters: tricky Atheist Myths". warm off the click - in in-intensity study. examine Dawkins and Robertson and make up your human being ideas. 2 different those who've examine it are Alister McGrath and Joanna McGrath, and they have co-authored their reaction pronounced as "The Dawkins fantasy" (revealed via SPCK). that is a better selective reaction by using time and length constraints. Of word is the shown reality that Alister McGrath grow to be once an Atheist. that is a short, tutorial artwork.

Answer 5

6 hours 23 minutes, but it would not be wasted, because it would be read in lew of watching tv or some other time wasting activity.

comapred to the Years that i have spent studying the bible this is hardly knoticable to me in the ammount of time that i waste reading every year.

Answer 6

I just ordered that and Sam Harris's book, "Letters to a Christian Nation". I can't wait to read them. If you are confident in your faith in every belief that you hold dear, you should read "Letters". If will show you a different way you can think, and if you are intelligent like I know you are, then you will understand what he is talking about. About a better way to be a human.

Answer 7

I don't consider any time wasted reading his books. He's very intelligent and all of his books are well written.

Answer 8

5 days

Answer 9

I would be wasting all of the time it took to read it.

Answer 10

all the time it took to read it.
if you know for sure that 1+1=2,
is it not a waste of time to read some foolish human theory which claims that 1+1=3?
"Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools".
Romans 1:22