the nazis were not as passionate in their goals, they did not have the desire to kill themselves as in the suicide bombers they have, there was a desire to cleanse themselves of what they considered inferior races not so in Islamic Jihad they are saying that their god is the best of all and they are willing to die for that believe and death to all those that do not believe their way so the difference is the Nazi had it in for the Jewish people the islamic Jihad has it in for all those that do not think as they do not just one set of people.
2007-02-03 13:47:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by billc4u 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
A. you don't know what true jihad is in islam, true jihad can range from taking care of your parents in old age to being a martyr, your just brainwashed by the media
B. "radicals" are less than 1% of the billions of Muslims around the world
C. Nazis took up more than 1% of Germany, and there are just as many secret nazis as muslim radicals.
2007-02-03 14:21:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by crystalclear72000 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow, what a crock... Crusaders tried to regain the holy lands from Muslim occupiers. the comparable ingredient befell in Spain & France yet they weren't referred to as "crusades" jihad potential "very own war" besides the incontrovertible fact that it relatively is bastardized via Islamacists to contain warring upon whichever enemy is chosen. the form you utilize those words propose some form of implied relativity between them, like they're the comparable ingredient or offset one yet another. it relatively is ridiculous and a susceptible argument. "to benefit extra financial potential of the international" potential what- to get Iraq'a oil? expenses have by no potential been larger for oil so how are we benefitting? We specific don't get any for unfastened from Iraq. The WMD's might desire to be everywhere-Syria or Iran, undergo in innovations the 6 or 7 months it took the UN to twiddle it relatively is thumbs? The Oil for nutrition boondoggle became into making too a lot funds for each man or woman and no person needed to lose out. this is whilst any form of organic and organic and nuclear brokers might desire to've been moved. do no longer you undergo in innovations the SCUD casings the Italians discovered that had strains of Sarin in them??? nicely shop attempting, perchance you will hit upon a reason sometime which will make removing Saddam look like a foul concept. The Iraqi's specific seem to love vote casting- undergo in innovations?
2016-10-01 09:36:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by gerking 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hitler viewed the Jews as "Christ killers" and believed that Jesus wanted him to avenge his death (this from his own speeches). What's the difference between the Nazis and fundamentalist Christianity? Ask your local abortion doctor.
It always amazes me when people point fingers at someone like Hitler (Catholic), forgetting that much of his insanity was based on his interpretation of scripture.
2007-02-03 13:46:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Nazis had uniforms.
2007-02-03 13:51:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Beavis Christ AM 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Nazis were clean, other than that not much.
2007-02-03 13:45:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by ventgen@sbcglobal.net 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nazis were pagans and Jihadists aren't. Also there is the whole genocide issue...
2007-02-03 13:44:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Dysthymia 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because Nazism is not a religion. Its just a cheap knockoff of the Inquisition. Islam does not target Jews.
2007-02-03 13:43:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
both follow sadist leaders.
one was brave enough to fight by himself, one takes the name of god.
2007-02-03 13:44:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
they are underestimated
2007-02-03 13:44:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by someone 1
·
2⤊
0⤋