No where and it isn't a sin to do so. I love all men, just not jerks!
Krazy Libra
2007-02-03 12:50:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by krazy_libra_from_ac 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Matt.14:37
2007-02-03 12:51:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
i could not inform you the position precisely, yet i comprehend that it develop right into a commandment for the human beings to chorus from marrying outdoors of the tribe, with a view to guard the Israelites from blending with the Gentiles and dropping the kin histories and traditions. In previous testomony cases, in the previous recorded historic past develop into wide-spread, it develop into the in common words way for the human beings to bypass their historic past alongside and guard their covenant courting with God. even as addressing race, the Bible speaking of a "non secular lineage" or persons of a unique cultural or tribal nature. This develop into noticeably a commandment exceeded on to perserve the subculture of a human beings, no longer a worthiness situation. Black and White are only dermis, that are factors taken from the earth, which will sometime go back to the earth. non secular renovation develop into the area at question. In immediately's society, there is not any longer some thing that disqualifies us from passing our beliefs and traditions to our posterity. blending with one from yet another subculture does no longer avoid us or our posterity, to the traditions of the subculture. there is not any reason 2 those who love and devote to at least one yet another could no longer be married, regardless of their color of dermis.
2016-11-24 23:20:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by withy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It doesn't. God says we are to be equally yoked, the person you date or marry should have the same faith. In Acts 17:26 Paul says " And He has made from one blood every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth. We all started with Adam & Eve.
steadfast 1 <><
2007-02-03 13:12:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Steadfast † One 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
When moses married an ethiopian, the elders argued with for doing so.
but there are NON bliblical historical manuscripts that teach such things.
the curse of Cain was given by God and he became a vagabond in the land, he was a son of perdition and the Adam and eve declared to their sons NOT to marry into His genaology. But the sons of Adam LOVED satan more.
So when the curse of satan was transferred through the flood through HAM, noah commanded HIS children not to mix seed with the descendants of Of CAIN.
AFter Moses was born it was commanded of God NOT to mix seed with the heathen and the gentiles because of the traditions of Noah through abraham. if geneaology and perfection were declared UNTO both NOAH and Enoch out of keeping their DnA PURE and their path straight. then it should also be upon all of the succeeding chosen people of God.
but in the LDS church the revelations of God described that mixxing the seeds of the ONE type of people would also bring a fallen stature upon believers. in those days the Constitution of the United States was also believed to be the Divine Will of God. in the divine words ALSO a black man was considered less than a righteous man because of the traditions of the curses of God upon the servants of Satan throughout history.
So even christianity had the same kind of racism as a common era belief.
I came to believe that God can change the color of a mans skin to show different types of Genealogy. it only causes strife in Unbelievers who follow paths of hatred. One of the curses of NOAH was that the children of HAM would be SLAVES of Slaves, it is not clear to me that the true interpretation exists on MORTAL men, but in the resurrecton TOO. which can also mean tha white men can find their skin color altered to black as a punishment in the resurrection, or vise versa.
I KNOW without a doubt that Black Men can soar to greater promises of their resurrection, and personally, i believe they can also choose if they want to KEEP their Black roots. but have a the name of the LORD tatooed in their forehead to show their FREEDOM.
the Whole history of racisim on controversial issues is shrouded in confusions and false beliefs. The KKK are the worst offenders of following False beliefs.
Mixxed relgious marriages are also the same type of contentions among races as well as among same race contexts, they have their tribulations and long sufferings as well, UNLESS there is TRUE LOVE and Covenant Commitment, such things are also high discouraged out of true faith. but NOT completely justfied in righteousness. If moses married an ethiopian and there was some sort of disagreement, there must've been something of race if not relgious contention arleady.
i can explain more but this is the wrong forum to. what ihave said is almost complete.
2007-02-03 13:06:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It NEVER says that. It ONLY says that animals and trees and plants "shall put forth according to their kind." And, as humans, race doesn't define a "kind," humanity does. So, all it means is that a woman will only bring forth a human, nothing about race.
2007-02-03 12:53:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by AdamKadmon 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I'll go one step further...Acts 10:34,35 states: At this Peter opened his mouth and said: “For a certainty I perceive that God is not partial, but in every nation the man that fears him and works righteousness is acceptable to him.
So, if God is not partial, we should not be either.
2007-02-03 13:02:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Badriya 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
nowhere. there's nothing wrong with it.
and darth_maul_8805 or whatever, muhammed is in the Quran, not The Bible....and Moses wife was from Cush, so she could have been Arab or black.
2007-02-03 12:53:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Hey, Ray 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I doesn't in fact mosses married an Ethiopian woman
2007-02-03 12:54:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Moses married an Ethiopian, Solomon had black wives and so did Muhammad.
2007-02-03 12:52:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by darth_maul_8065 5
·
0⤊
1⤋