English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Let's say you're pregnant.

Technology can 'detect' in the womb the sexual orientation of the child.

Stay with me here.....this is based on the 'assumption' that people are born gay.....

Your child is found to be homosexual.

Would you abort this child?

.

2007-02-03 11:48:42 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Wow....I didn't realize by asking this question I'd be called an idiot, stupid and a fat @ss bigoted pig!!

I thought I was safe with the nice Christians. Guess I was wrong.

2007-02-03 12:17:59 · update #1

Well.....at least some of you were very nice. Thank you for your input!

2007-02-03 12:20:56 · update #2

WhyUsukk:
I was unaware that gays "recruit".
Do you have any facts to back that up?

2007-02-04 12:10:43 · update #3

10 answers

I would still have the child and love my child. Because a person is gay doesn't mean that MaMa can't love him/her.

2007-02-03 13:22:44 · answer #1 · answered by angel 7 · 1 0

☼ Interesting question. ☼

No. Abortion is wrong, no matter how the child may or may not turn out.

I would raise my child to the best of my ability as a Christian woman. ☺ When the child becomes of age, they'll be able to make the choice regarding their relationship with God as well as their sexual orientation. That choice would be between him or her and God, it would have nothing to do with me.

☺ All I could hope for is that I did the best I could in raising my child to be a responsible and loving Christian. ☺

♥♥♥ I'll love them regardless of what he/she does once they become an adult. ♥♥♥

► Really with all parents and children there'll always be things that they may or may not agree with.
►► I don't agree with homosexuality and abortion. God through the Bible says that it's wrong. There's no grey area.
►►►If my child, using their own reasoning, decides differently then we'll just have to agree to disagree. My love for them will never diminish but my love for what they do will.

2007-02-03 12:21:14 · answer #2 · answered by ♥☺ bratiskim∞! ☺♥ 6 · 1 0

I would not for the life of me. It would still be murder. Besides, homosexuality has not been proven to be genetically caused. The environment also has something to do with it. If he turns out to be gay there are many ways of dealing with it like psychotherapy and hormone treatment.
Have a blessed day

2007-02-03 12:00:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

you're precise. a great number of little ones who discovered something in any respect about sex, abstinance, birth control, being pregnant, abortion, etc. discovered it in kinfolk existence guidance at college. And we are able to't be too black and white about abortion both devoid of understanding each and every of the situations. Abortion as a attitude to birth control should not be needed on the hot time, yet as you're saying, the lots are frequently "secure" hostile to knowledge with assistance from their closed-minded guardians. undesirable pregnancies deliver about human beings having to make your ideas up on maximum ideal for them, and their options are not continuously common with others, even even if it truly isn't any one else's business business enterprise. the greatest thanks to tutor human beings on the thanks to circumvent pregnancies and STIs, and reduce the type of terminations of pregnancies is through prepared, kinfolk existence/planned parenthood preparation in college. If this can be coupled with valuable parental guidance and practise contained in the living house, each and every of the more effective. regrettably, the records coach that it truly is hardly adequate the case, nor are make sure and non secular-depending classes continuously very purpose or life like. finished sex guidance reduces youngster pregnancies (see article below).

2016-11-02 06:07:35 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Most people who are against homosexuality also think it's a choice. If they found out that their child is "likely" to be homosexual they'd also believe that they could change this child. My guess is that they'd allow the child to live just to subject it to a lifetime (or at least 18 years) of forced "conversion" therapy.

2007-02-03 11:51:57 · answer #5 · answered by ZER0 C00L ••AM••VT•• 7 · 3 3

abortion takes a life... and life is not mine to make a decision about... my child is my child and a mother's love is unique in that, no matter what our child is like/does/chooses, we still love them... we may not like what they choose, but predetermining whatever choices they make in the future (whether it was homosexuality/murder/rape/theft/lies/hatred/etc) would not make us love our children any less.

2007-02-03 12:00:26 · answer #6 · answered by livinintheword † 6 · 2 1

I would laugh at the "scientist" who said my boy would suck. No people are born gay. otherwise why would gays try to recruit peopel into their perversion?

2007-02-04 02:36:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I would have the child.

2007-02-03 12:00:38 · answer #8 · answered by Giggly Giraffe 7 · 2 0

No, Abortion is murder and at the very least the child can abstain from sex.

2007-02-03 11:52:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 7 6

That is such a stretch.

I pray for you.

2007-02-03 11:51:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 6

fedest.com, questions and answers