You would need to change the definition of god rather dramatically.
1. First get rid of the idea of god as a creator, since I see no evidence anything is ever really created.
2. I believe reality is mathematics, but mathematics is unlike any god I ever heard theists describe. I can't see anyone praying to Fermat's Theorem for example.
2007-02-03 13:16:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The one I like in Genesis 1 is That force which alone is able to bring order out of the primeval chaos.
2007-02-03 19:23:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Joe Cool 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
it is scientifically possible to prove the stories of historical testimonies in the bible through archeology and through Contrasting historical manuscripts that AGREE among each other, through generations.
The fact that a bible code exists shows that scientific methods were used to write the bible, but it also show where the bible was mistranslated and changed/ altered or just plain corrupted.
if the bible says Abraham and his wife were visited by THREE personages and in one place it says they were angels and in antoher place says ONE of them was God, and then Jesus Plainly refers to ONE of the promises of SEEING GOD the FATHER and the SON and they will come and Eat Dinner with Such a person for fullfilling the requirments, YOU can scientfically prove that two stories agree and it is possible to SEE God and have a visitation from Them.
So in conclusion the links below Prove that God visits men of faith Even of perfection.
2007-02-03 19:38:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Perhaps "God" is something that evolved on another planet that has capacities beyong our greatest imaginations, and he came to Earth to screw us up. Or, humans may just be running as stimulations on a alien computer.
None of those are scientific, so shoot me.
2007-02-03 19:25:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I am sorry but your question contradicts itself. 'Scientific Conceptions' Science is provable by facts. A concept is a thought and idea. I imagine tho that some scientists believe in God but I know one very well who doesn't believe in anything unseen.
2007-02-03 19:25:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by dtwladyhawk 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
The second law of thermodynamics. Organised systems tend to move from a state of organisation to a state of disorganisation. Our universe is an organised system. An Intelligent Designer must have created it. There is also evidence of disorganization (entropy) stars die, etc.
Have a blessed day
2007-02-03 19:30:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Mental illness.
2007-02-03 19:25:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by S K 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, science can only answer HOW, it's never once tried to answer WHY. So I don't see how the two can ever marry up.
2007-02-03 19:24:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Snowth 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
That's a good question. I would suggest you look into quantum physics for your answer.
2007-02-03 19:24:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Apache 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
There aren't any. That's why religious fanatics are always trying to disprove evolution. It makes their religions seem fictitious and improbable.
2007-02-03 19:23:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ann 3
·
1⤊
2⤋