English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

All scientific laws are ultimately imagination and they are valid only under certain conditions.

2007-02-03 08:28:43 · 11 answers · asked by indianborntowin 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

No body is asking for a proof of elctrons, neutrons, atoms etc. These are all just imagination but every one believes it. Why?

2007-02-03 08:32:31 · update #1

11 answers

How you are able ask such questions to people across the world.
Is it not proof for science.
To understand science you must be able to think.But believers cannot see or think beyond some barriers unless they choose to come out of it.

2007-02-04 03:29:29 · answer #1 · answered by Elango 3 · 0 0

Why do people believe in religion just because a book says it is that way?

I work in science, I'm a chem lab tech & engineer. Scientific laws guide what I do and sometimes there are none that cover what I do so I have to create a hypothesis and test it. The test results confirm or invalidate the hypothesis. If it works I believe it because it is tested and proved. If it doesn't I go back to the drawing board. That is what science is and how it is meant to work. It is a continueing process of learning and growth.

2007-02-03 16:34:13 · answer #2 · answered by genaddt 7 · 3 0

Could you give an example of what you are talking about! Perhaps and example of one scientific law which is imagination and is only valid under certain conditions.

2007-02-03 16:31:47 · answer #3 · answered by eastchic2001 5 · 1 0

Proof of Gravity (a so called scientific assumption):

1) pick up ball
2) hold ball over head
3) release ball
4) watch ball fall to ground

Proof of God (a so called fact)

1) pray for a million dollars
2) pray for divine revelation
3) pray for the paper cut to heal on your finger
4) wait
5) wait
6) still waiting
7) anybody catch the game last night?
8) wait some more
9) "assume" that you will be waiting a long time
10) give up

2007-02-03 16:34:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

You have to agree that you can t arrive at any conclusion with all
parameters as variables.one side should be standardised and the other compared to it.This is the principle of reconciliation.
People believe scientific concepts, as the same work, for which u
have to keep the conditions going.

2007-02-03 16:47:35 · answer #5 · answered by Chandrasekaran S 1 · 0 0

Given that we cannot know anything about the world directly, we all make assumptions. Without assumptions, we'd have no knowledge at all.

Scientific assumptions, however, can be tested and verified, which is what makes them useful.

2007-02-03 16:33:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The first concept of a higher power (one god) was that of Mother Nature!. I believe it was by Humans before we where called ”Homo Sapiens”. Females are the barer of life. Think about this, doesn’t it make more sense that god is a female "Barer of All Life" universal. Evolution is an adjustment to the environment (survival) based on time. Since Mother Nature controls evolution this would combine Science and Religion into one Philosophy of our origin.

2007-02-03 16:32:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Maybe because everyone else paid attention in science class when they offered you proof of electrons, proof of atoms, proof of physical laws.

2007-02-03 16:42:26 · answer #8 · answered by eri 7 · 1 0

Our limited sensors and mind accepts whatever is in perception range.We can see the repetetion of the same under the same conditions.And we do n't find major change in the result.hence we say this is truth.

2007-02-07 08:23:48 · answer #9 · answered by umesh r 1 · 0 0

I dunno, but I do plan to assume and imagine that gravity will continue to hold me to the Earth.

Unless it's really a bunch of devils trying to drag me under.....

2007-02-03 16:36:34 · answer #10 · answered by Sun: supporting gay rights 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers