to get Bin-laden? Al-queda is still alive and well (according to Repubs and Dems alike) Pakistan has proven to be sorry allies in the "war on terror". Why give up on him and continue our Iraqi debacle?
2007-02-03 08:20:39 · 14 answers · asked by popeyethesadist 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Because this war has NOTHING to do with terrorism. Exactly one year prior to 9-11, PNAC (Project for a New American Century, a Washington-based think tank) published a white paper ("Rebuilding America's Defenses...") calling for the creation of Pax Americana, or rather an American Global Hegemony (New World Order). One of the things they called for is a permanent American military presence in the Middle East to stabilize that area. Everyone keeps saying it's about oil, but it goes MUCH deeper than that.
You need to be aware that all of the TOP seats in our government are occupied by THE founding members of PNAC, so in essence, PNAC is in control of our government.
So, you noticed too that Democrats are not making NEARLY enough of a stink about this war, or the president's changes in our Constitution? I think it's about time to get rid of this government, and start all over from scratch.
2007-02-03 08:31:54 · answer #1 · answered by tat2me1960 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
We did now no longer invade Iraq for WMD's, we did via handfuls of UN violations that Saddam had dedicated interior the previous decade and for the mass homicide of tens of thousands of Kurds. we've not invaded Iran. united statesCole terrorist attack= Al Qaeda Lockby Scotland Airport = Lybian chief Moromar Quidafi 9/11 = Al Qaeda What are your info as Paskistan via actual actuality the culpable reason? Do the leaders of Pakastin orginize those attacks? you could now no longer blame the country for the acts of the voters. Blame the govenment leaders in the adventure that they are the reason ie Saddam & Quidafi
2016-11-02 05:46:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We don't need to invade them to catch one man. Bush has already said that if he gets solid intelligence of bin Laden being in Pakistan we will go and get him, with or without Pakistan's permission.
2007-02-03 08:31:39 · answer #3 · answered by Curt 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Two reasons...1) Pakistan may be a weak ally,but it's an ally, nonetheless. 2) They have nukes
Need I say more?
2007-02-03 08:27:18 · answer #4 · answered by Magic Mouse 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Because pakistan is an ally. unstable but and ally with nukes if pakistan goes to war is again India and they booth have nukes.
2007-02-03 08:36:27 · answer #5 · answered by joytoy1963 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Pakistan is not Iraq....or Vietnam.....I think that Americans in general have NO IDEA of the military capabilities of half the countries in the world......Pakistan would kick the USA's *** in a ground war.....and don't forget ...they have NUKE's........No offence but I think most American's think of Pakistanni's or Indian's as " cab drivers "....too much info from the right wing propaganda machine...
2007-02-03 08:30:26 · answer #6 · answered by PigPen 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
they are invading themselves...
we will after Iran's revolution ends and it turns itself into a democracy, Iraq's democracy is protected, and Afghanistan is free of those Al-Queda extremists.
10-15 more years and pakistan will get gang banged by NATO, US, Britain, Iran, Iraq, Israel and Afghanistan.
2007-02-03 08:24:53 · answer #7 · answered by Corey 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
LOL !!
Do your realy think your governament want to get Osama?? from one report i have learnt that four of the french army peoples who were working with american army have confirmed that they got Osam on target twice but american army didn't let them to kill him.....how strange !! and would u please tell me that your Nasa takes only 90 minutes to search a missing shuttle in space and recover it but coudn't get osam till now who is living on earth? Have you ever thought of it? Conclusions is that osama is an american pet !
And for Pakistan so unfortunatly Pakistani president is under bush' command till now and america is too busy with iraq and iran issues.........well i m sure iran would not be an easy target and would not let America occupy whole middle east that easily ..and after finishing with that america would turn towards pakistan.they are already in afghanistan so it would be easy for them to target it.......
But mind you , Pakistani president can be an american pet but not Pakistani public.....We peoples realy get mad when it comes to our country,........Just give it a try ! ;)
Oh and war on terror......soo funny............"fight a war on terror and become a beggist terrorist " ..........True???
2007-02-03 08:56:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
you must really love death blood and suffering you have probally never seen it first hand. i was 17 in vietnam one day when i saw my best friend s head splatter and spray his brain skull and blood all over me i was 6 inches away, i saw death rape mayem murder maiming suffering and for what you not wish for war anyware. i was in the jungle one night in nam surrounded by vc a whole platoon went right by luckly i was not spotted. it was terrifying . you should promote peace
2007-02-03 10:58:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
There isn't enough oil or opium in Pakistan to make it a worthwhile target, is there?
2007-02-03 08:24:45 · answer #10 · answered by Sara Katrina 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋