Trust me...They are. They are just trying to keep it low level...for now. We may be a superpower, but our forces are pretty thin right now. These things take time. jason
2007-02-03 07:59:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Magic Mouse 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The US is really in a poor position right now. Due to the mistakes that took place involving the "justification" in going into Iraq, everyone involved realizes that there has to be hard-core proof linking Iran, the country, to the insurgency in Iraq. Yes, I'm sure as is most of the world that Iran and Syria are both supporting the civil war in Iraq. This will not matter one but until there is undeniable proof that the government of each nation is caught red-handed that anything will be said officially about it.
Secondly, even a superpower as the US can only be stretched so thin before it breaks. Iraq will need to ask from help from some the UN for sanctions that really place a bite on Iran and Syria. In the long run invading Iran would probably squelch a surprisingly large amount of sectarian violence in Iraq, but the short-term effects of the lost of additional troops and the stretching out of an already thin military structure would probably provide disastrous for the US Military.
2007-02-04 15:16:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bradford S 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
egh... you are a fool MaxNHL. The truth is we dont have Substantial Evidence to eliminate such a threat.
Also doing so will force Iran to open all of its sleeper cells, and if I was Iran I'd accidently lose some of my chemical weapons before I fall.
The line if support your troops is what is now used because they can not garner support for the war, Do I think we should cut off supplies to our troops though? No I do not, I think we should start pulling them out, and let the Iraqis have real freedom by letting the damn thing split into 3 parts.
Unfortunatly people try to say, well if you dont support the war, you dont support the troops. Go **** off. I support my troops fully, just not the war.
oh and this is to you personally MaxNHL: Listen up buddy, I am in the ****** Navy and I am proud to be in it, and I will protect this country. But that does not mean I have to believe everything that comes out of a politicians dribble. I can think on my own and I have my own opinions on things.
2007-02-04 11:03:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sean 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
For some reason they are pretending to care about what arrogant imbosils likeHillary are going to say or what fox might interpret it to be. When our president ignores others the way the greatest we ever had like Reagan, only then will the stupidity takeing place in Iraq when come to an end. To hear Hillary say " if they don't end it I will is the best reason I've seen yet not to vote for her because 'she' can do "NOTHING", and to think she can is nonsense. Bush will take on this secondary government in his time and as long as he gives the morons like Kerry and Hillary the finger he will suceed but not with the few troops he's sending to satisfie these 'polaticians , but with enough to kick a-ss. All this has been going on sense the Carter adm. and it's time to show them all we the AMERICANS are NOT to be f--ked with anymore. Anything less is the appearence of fighting for bullsh-it.
2007-02-03 16:21:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unlike for the war in Iraq, which the Democrats have voted in favor of there is no support of declaring war on Iran. Most in the Congress now are liberal mother**** and could care less about the troops and their country.
Liberals=traitors for they do not care if their people are killed. After 9/11 when Pres. Bush wanted war against Afganistan liberals protested against the war eventhough they played a part of it by supporting bin Laden. I have no respect for Liberals.
If I was the President I would have used my 90 days to raige war without Congress approval to destroy Iranian threat. He threatens to nuke USA we have never taken that threat to Iran. Every day the Presient of Iran yells how he is going to wipe USA and Isarel of the face of the Earth. The Liberals would let him do this and assist him by cutting spending of the army. This is what the Democrats are trying to do.
2007-02-04 02:14:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by MaxNHL 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
We are waiting for Israel to act. We will allow Israel to attack the Iranian Nuclear facilities then we will follow up once Iran responds to Israel.
2007-02-03 15:55:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by 3rd parties for REAL CHANGE 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
They want to gather more fake "evidence" so that they can justify a nuclear attack on Iran's NONEXISTENT nuclear weapons.
2007-02-03 15:53:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
It's easier to fight an enemy outside their home field.
We learn this in football, you should have too.
2007-02-03 15:55:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Because Bush lies. He lied before. We hopefully will be careful before rushing into another war based on lies.
2007-02-03 15:51:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋