Just being silly.... :-)
2007-02-03 00:24:24 · 7 answers · asked by ivan_beals 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
they can, but the insurance companies will weasel out of it. Remind you of some other group also pointing to god?
2007-02-03 00:33:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know, but the oldest Catholic Church in my hometown was struck by lightening and burned to the ground about 10 years ago. Serious. Now, what was the insurance claim on that??!
2007-02-03 00:33:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of cause he can and it would be in the rules of how the world started in his mind.
If it happened by mistake then it was an act of God to him but if it was planed by someone then it was terrorism
that catholic church might have burnt down the house in my question. "Is it an act of God if the catholics burn down your house"
2007-02-03 00:29:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
When it comes to money religion or lack of goes out the window.
2007-02-03 00:27:01 · answer #4 · answered by daljack -a girl 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"#a million) What makes info actuality contained in the first position? rather because it could be falsified. #2) you won't be able to say for particular that something does no longer exist because there is no info. you're saying "i do not understand." in the different case, you're claiming to attraction to close something which could no longer knowable. you could anticipate that it does no longer exist, yet assumption isn't actuality." a million) info can of direction be refuted, yet until eventually it truly is, it truly is credible and it contributes. 2)God is unfaithful until eventually shown in the different case. Its a logical stance. "What may be asserted devoid of info is also brushed aside devoid of info", the load of evidence lies on the believer, no longer the skeptic. I of direction won't be able to say for particular that god would not exist, yet i'm fairly constructive he would not. Theres a threat that the Flying Duckling of Kumbaya exists, yet because it change into asserted devoid of info, i will brush aside it devoid of info. ----- ""God is unfaithful until eventually shown in the different case. Its a logical stance." incorrect! it isn't knowable" I addressed this challenge in my second paragraph. a thanks to examine guy. "i will not say that purple unicorns do not exist on yet another planet in deep area." certain you could, you could say "it is unfaithful until eventually shown in the different case", or "i do not understand". Im no longer denying the prospect.
2016-11-02 05:06:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
haha good question. i think thats just the fancy term the insurance co. calls it
2007-02-03 00:29:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Atheists can do anything
2007-02-03 00:27:44 · answer #7 · answered by akband 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋