English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Indian scientists including the engineers do very well abroad. His counterpart in India struggles to be productive.

2007-02-02 20:53:33 · 3 answers · asked by mandira_nk 4 in Politics & Government Civic Participation

3 answers

I'll tell ya what ails Indian science. This topic is one close to my heart, and I have strong views on it...

1. Lack of proper education
2. If some junior Einstein by some strange miracle emerges with his brains intact out of school and college, no job availability or pure science graduates.

I happen to personally know many potential youngsters who refuse to take up pure sciences, simply because they know that they're going to be underpaid and unrecognised. Applied sciences means they get a basic salary, a car and better marriage prospects.

Then the list goes on...no oppurtunities, no funding for research scholars, few scholarships, not many jobs in the academic line, and those that exist are difficult to get into and underpaid...

No Nobel Prizes for science from India for the next fifty years, I reckon.

2007-02-03 03:27:32 · answer #1 · answered by debergeracvat 2 · 0 0

we are always fighting against vested interest --- business and health The sin bin -Vested interest Apathy and other unworthy systems As you can see I am not the only one saying this is happening hi my background is research inventions where i am in touch with quite a few other researchers some of whom have suffered massively dealing with vested interest factions. so if you value your health you better get aware of these problems and the health care systems this information certainly has the capacity to unnerve you. However if you do like to know what is going on and are not afraid of the truth read on, it is very enlightening. Drugs and other treatments There are a few very important points that I would like to cover on the subject of drugs and research and treatment At present the system in England is this ,and this principle will apply to other countries as well all treatment recommended by the health care people should be tested and approved and quite rightly so Obviously it costs vast sums of money to test and approve treatments because of the possible damage to people and the subsequent litigation costing millions of pounds. The point is this Where does this money come from to test and approve treatments? By far the biggest source is the drug companies. Do you think drug companies are some charitable institution –they are there to make profit What do you think the implications of that statement means So take for example a researcher might go along to his local drug company and tell them his findings about this treatment he has been working on which is of outstanding value but needs testing further or approving, you might think they would be falling over themselves to know more –right, you could not be more wrong. only treatments which show a profit will even get examined. Because they are in business to make a profit, not for serving the people. So many of the thousands of therapies which they see as having no profit potential do not get approved and thus by and large do not get recommended by your local doctor or hospital despite the fact that some of them do have overwhelming benefits some which have saved needless operations, needless amputations, needless pain and trauma, needless kidney failures and much loss of life. Did you know there are groups of people begging drug companies to look into certain therapies for their possible benefit but many wont –why-- money in the main Your local G.P/ doctor is not a researcher , what does this mean , he is very taxed with his time that means he cannot do research he finds it very difficult to keep up with what is going on In the main he is told what to prescribe he does not even have the time often to look at research. At this minute 2004 approx 5000 Beds are being taken up by people who have had reactions to drugs. Some will die others will be maimed .That is fact So Mrs Jones by and large you will probably only get recommended treatments where there is profit in them for someone. Have you heard your local doctor recommend, Massage, Spiritual healing, Knieisiology Herbs, Light therapy, Colour therapy, Regression therapy, Osteopathy, Zappers, Magnetic devices, Electrical Frequency devices .karma therapy, Decent nutrition, Beck devices, Colonics, enemas, Detoxing, The violet ray, The wet cel The radial appliance , Has he ever mentioned nutrition what you eat how much protein carbo vitamins etc . All of these have shown their inherent worth with thousands if not millions of testimonials. As you can see this system in its present state is inherently flawed which is why you are getting recommended what you are that is until the day comes when most of the research and testing is done by an agency with no vested interests attached and a clear agenda of being objective. Acting for the people s health interest.. There is clear evidence that some of these drug companies will even go much further than just dismiss this proposed treatment especially if it is going to affect their profits. Imagine this 10 000 patients on some drug costing say 500-1000 pounds each per year Average time to get well 20 yrs –income in that time –go on work it out Then an invention come s along and hey presto we can get them well in just 6 weeks at a cost of 200 quid Do you think they will just sit around and go err – what planet are you on jack? Ever heard of a brilliant doctor with the name of Raymond rife the gifted scientist and winner of 14 government awards including scientist of the year award twice. Rife discovered that some major diseases could be eliminated with frequencies based on that diseases individual electromagnetic signature. He uses the same effect, which causes a glass to shatter by the use of some peoples voices. These distinguished medical doctors who originally confirmed part or this entire discovery i

2016-05-23 22:39:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Capital investment is the basic answer. I presume you are referring to Indian engineers doing well because they are employed overseas. An engineer can either innovative for his/herself, or innovate for someone else who provides the capital. Either way, capital is required to complete the innovation process.

2007-02-03 00:39:36 · answer #3 · answered by freemichaelcampaign 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers