The answer is YES the current bible (old and new) are the biggest farce played on human kinds from east to west.
Martin Luther the founder of the Protestant church actually aimed redemption of all Jews to attract them to the christian faith.
He published his book "Jesus was Born a Jew" in 1523 where he called the Jews : the Children of God in his book and that Christians are the outcast eating the crumbs of their masters the Jews.
Today 95% of the American protestant evangelical churches preach the very same belief that Martin Luther procreated and later regretted his attempt to win the Jews to his side.
Martin Luther revolt on the Catholic church resulted in they creation of the Zionist christian belief which has infiltrated the minds and souls of American protestants believing they are "Jews" themselves, contrary to the real original faith that Jews are Jesus Christ killers, the elephant sitting in the corner of the room that no one wants to question.
2007-02-02 19:51:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by WO LEE 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
The Latin Vulgate version of the Bible used by Martin Luther was not written by him. He only questioned the authority of Rome concerning their interpretation of the scripture and the with-holding of certain passages from all members of the laity. Martin Luther fell into disgrace because of his belief in the grace of God to forgive all sinners without the need for ritual and confessional before the priest. This was an attack on the need for a papacy.
2007-02-03 02:39:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by martha d 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
it really doesn't matter - The most "authoritative" accounts of a historical Jesus come from the four canonical Gospels of the Bible. Note that these Gospels did not come into the Bible as original and authoritative from the authors themselves, but rather from the influence of early church fathers, especially the most influential of them all: Irenaeus of Lyon who lived in the middle of the second century. Many heretical gospels got written by that time, but Irenaeus considered only some of them for mystical reasons. He claimed only four in number; according to Romer, "like the four zones of the world, the four winds, the four divisions of man's estate, and the four forms of the first living creatures-- the lion of Mark, the calf of Luke, the man of Matthew, the eagle of John (see Against the Heresies). The four gospels then became Church cannon for the orthodox faith. Most of the other claimed gospel writings were burned, destroyed, or lost." [Romer]
Elaine Pagels writes: "Although the gospels of the New Testament-- like those discovered at Nag Hammadi-- are attributed to Jesus' followers, no one knows who actually wrote any of them." [Pagels, 1995]
2007-02-03 02:32:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, Luther wanted to do the same thing Jesus did. To get free from certain rules and regulations.
2007-02-03 02:43:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by The Daughter of the King, BaC 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No Martin Luther rebelled against the catholic traditions and goes more by the bible instead of mans word!
2007-02-03 02:30:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by bungyow 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
The Bible has been tampered with by hundreds of people. If Martin Kuther did, he wouldn't have been the first.
2007-02-03 02:29:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Wiseguy 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
No.
He went against the Catholic Church. Not against the Bible.
He was a Protestant of the Catholic Church. Not a Protestant of the Word of God.
2007-02-03 02:30:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by RR 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Compared to what the Catholic Church was doing? I doubt it.
2007-02-03 02:31:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Da Mick 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
the entire Bible was falsified from the start....he was just another part of the process
2007-02-03 02:28:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
No he did not
peace
2007-02-03 02:55:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by the shiz 5
·
0⤊
0⤋