2007-02-02 16:21:36 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
I love bacon. I love eggs
I love bacon and eggs
all three are good. same with love, lust and love & lust.
To answer the question with a forced choice:
love without lust is useless but lust without love is very satisfying so i guess i must choose LUST if I can have only one.
2007-02-02 16:26:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Love without lust.
2007-02-02 16:24:26 · answer #2 · answered by debralizjr 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Love without lust for sure
2007-02-02 16:25:56 · answer #3 · answered by lover4ne1 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow! That's a goodie!
I need love rather than lust, so I guess I'd say 'love without lust'.
One usually has lust in the beginning of a relationship and that disappates and love deepens and one matures with the lust/love thing!
2007-02-02 16:25:11 · answer #4 · answered by Jan Frost 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
love without lust!
...because if the love is strong, so is everything else and it's based on how the person perceives you as yourself rather than looks or anything.. lust without love won't last long.. when someone gets bored of you or thinks you're not as hot as someone else out there than thats the end of that and besides, i think love can make a person happier than lust itself because you feel GENUINELY wanted and needed =]
2007-02-02 16:32:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lust without love is easier to deal with
2007-02-02 16:24:44 · answer #6 · answered by grtoo9 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Neither. Being without love would suck, but to be without lust would be to be without love. Some people might not admit it, but isn't lust the reason why we are interested in certain people in the first place? There has to be some sort of initial spark otherwise dating wouldn't happen.
2016-03-29 02:29:34 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
love without lust, because if you need love to have lust in the first place.
2007-02-02 16:24:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
have love without lust
2007-02-02 16:24:12 · answer #9 · answered by Thomas Odin M 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lust without love
physical chemical attraction; more excitement
2007-02-02 16:25:16 · answer #10 · answered by SweetBrunette 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋