The (insert religious adherents here) respond in droves to questions designed to get them to do so. It's like a pavlovian response.
They all answer with the same kind of statements, too, about their (insert deity here). For instance, somebody will ask "Why is it that (insert deity here) is not considered ultimately responsible for evil?
Crowds of (insert religious aherents here) make a cacophony of unintelligable "logic statement" or quotes from (insert "revealed" text here). It is distrubing, yet amusing. Eerie and funny ...
2007-02-02
14:49:10
·
15 answers
·
asked by
voodooprankster
4
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Thanks all for paying the toll. I am satisfied with everyone's response.
2007-02-02
17:32:48 ·
update #1
Why do "you" visit this forum? Are you a troll? What are you seeking?
I would enjoy answering any indepth questions that may arise in your tortured psyche, concerning our God...oops I meant (insert deity here)
2007-02-02 15:01:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by bonsai bobby 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Speaking of unintelligible "logic statements," that post made about as much sense as trying to read a bowl of alphabet soup.
If I'm translating you correctly, you claim that Christians
(or fundamentalists or whatever group you're mocking) get their bowels in an uproar over bait questions. That response isn't exactly limited to Christians around this forum, however.
Post something against atheism or evolution, and you'll see atheists coming out of the woodwork. Just take a look back through the list of questions if you don't believe me.
So don't point fingers at one group or the other. Both sides are just about equally guilty in the "Let's feed the troll" game.
2007-02-02 15:13:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Wolfeblayde 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I guess if that turns you on and makes you feel superior to others than that is what you need in life. It would seem to me that if you ask a question about (insert deity here) then those who all believe in this deity would answer pretty much the same. Much like if you asked about evolution, the answers would be some what the same. I guess that is funny?
2007-02-02 14:57:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by angel 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
certain, it is incorrect to categorise non secular adherents as obsequious sycophants merely with assistance from distinctive feature of their being an adherent to a faith. the vast majority of human beings contained in the international are portion of their non secular custom because they were born into it. And for the vast majority of those non secular traditions, to indicate that persons stay of their respective custom and "worship" - to apply your terminology - with the intention to attain an "eternal advantages" reflects both an utter lack of information of particular major (e.g., jap) non secular traditions and at acceptable a sketch of many western non secular traditions. Even in those religions in which there's a idea of a God or gods and likewise a concept in some type of afterlife, I strongly suspect that the conventional adherent provides some distance a lot less idea to and is a few distance a lot less in touch (or maybe perchance skeptical) about such issues as some leaders contained in the respective non secular traditions and their extra "non secular" followers. intense circumstances is also seen fundamentalists - yet with assistance from that element we are obviously no longer speaking about the conventional adherent.
2016-11-02 04:32:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
unintelligible? Speaking of - what's this garble
> Crowds of (insert religious aherents here) make a cacophony of unintelligable "logic statement" or quotes <
2007-02-02 15:03:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by JohnFromNC 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yeah, I guess some of them are motivated to think that they are doing good.
On the other hand, there are people genuinely seeking information here, and occasionally get sound guidance.
As for people here to bash and insult, have fun. It is kind of like a Karaoke bar. The drunker people get the more brave they are. Makes for lots of entertainment.
MU hat goes off to the people participating that are interested in the exchange of civil words. All of those here to poke fun are grandstand? Are just wasting their own and everyone else's time.
2007-02-02 14:53:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Tim 47 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
you are a smug bastard
i like that about you
i think the thing to do is ask why doesnt jesus talk about evolution
its like the two for one special
you ring that bell they salivate
its like a dog whistle their ears go up
they got that yahoo answers h@rd on and come running
GENESIS GENESIS
im a smug bastard too
2007-02-02 14:59:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Perhaps they forgo simple logic. I believe in God and all that yet I find logic very helpful.
2007-02-02 14:53:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Laela (Layla) 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
No I haven't noticed that. I'll say a prayer for you tonight. God bless and good night.
2007-02-02 14:53:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Pamela V 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
Yep,yep,yep.
2007-02-02 14:53:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by HoBo 4
·
2⤊
3⤋