2007-02-02 14:25:16 · 11 answers · asked by simple guy 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Well it is a warzone, and they are still trying to get the Iraqis to be able to defend themselves against the Muslim Extremist. So who knows, but probably when they are able to take care of there own country. Then the troops will come home.
But guess what if we are still in Iraq when the next presidential election comes around and a Democrate is elected the troops are still going to be there. Because no democrate is going to want the blood of a couple million of Iraqs in there hands
2007-02-02 14:28:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
You replied your human being question. i do not learn about the Humvee, i'm particular diverse human being automobiles are armored otherwise for diverse motives (i.e. possibly to save weight down) 2 and three are a huge fat 'convinced' shall we positioned it this kind once you're on the fringe of a bomb it truly is large adequate to kill you, you die. once you're far remote from a bomb it truly is not large adequate to kill you, you do not die. no matter if the Humvees are armored gained't fullyyt sparkling up the issue of hid roadside IEDs... there'll probable continuously be some that are large adequate to defeat really any armor shall we positioned on a patrolling Humvee.
2016-12-03 09:28:07 · answer #2 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
None should have to have died in Iraq. Before Bush sent US troop to "liberate" Iraq, he promised no American casualties. He promised that the Americans would be met in the streets of Baghdad with flowers. He did not expect the Iraqis to fight back. Surprise, Surprise.
2007-02-02 14:31:56 · answer #3 · answered by Ti 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The U.S. was willing to stomach 2,000 a day in WWII and the U.S. Civil War. Now half the country can't stomach less than 1,000 a year from hostile fire. If it got up to even 40,000 a year, car accidents in the U.S. would still kill more Americans by about 15,000.
2007-02-02 16:33:20 · answer #4 · answered by gregory_dittman 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Apparently at least two more years' worth.
George W. Bush is obviously determined to be a "war president" for the remainder of his term, and he doesn't care how many young men have to die to make sure he looks "tough" and "decisive".
2007-02-02 14:29:56 · answer #5 · answered by grrluknow 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Did it ever occur to you that these people might die even if they were home, or in Europe, or asleep in their beds? God decides when our number is up, no matter where we are.
2007-02-02 14:29:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
If Bush has his way? A lot more. Remember he's fixing to attack Iran too. Bush is not counting lives, he's counting dollars.
2007-02-02 14:31:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Only history will know.
2007-02-02 14:33:38 · answer #8 · answered by superman46320 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Too many.
2007-02-02 14:33:05 · answer #9 · answered by spunk113 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not sure, but i wish it would stop already.
2007-02-02 14:34:11 · answer #10 · answered by Nicole M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋