I agree that we are encouraging the terrorist to harass our soldiers over there by opposing the war! I sympathize the fear of losing our men of most people! But why we just concern about the near future without having any idea about the bigger picture! And it is ridiculous since some people make up excuse to say that the terrorist will recruit more because we oppose them. If we didn't oppose them, do you think they will slow down their recruitment?
2007-02-02 14:35:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by holyfire 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hey, I send letters, gifts, and support to troops in both fronts. I wish we finished the war in Afghanistan. THAT is where the A**HOLE who is responsible for 9/11 worked from...and things are getting worse there since Iraq is the political hot button. What really sucks is that North Korea HAS nuclear weapons, and we can't do anything about it.
2007-02-02 14:02:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Suzanne D 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
And how might they attack the US? Any Muslim who gets into the US by plane, ship, train, automobile, or on foot is instantly tracked by the NSA, FBI, local police, the US public, & homeland security. And do you have any idea how many new terrorists are getting on the job training in Iraq right now because of the war? How many new Bin Ladens are learning their craft right now in Iraq? Just like Bin Laden learned when fighting the Soviets.
2007-02-02 13:57:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This question leaks. The war was pushed on the false agenda of weapons of mass destruction and has now been exposed as a device for Bush and his junta to fill their pockets. If you still buy that rubbish about defending you abroad then you are too far gone to be redeemed by me or anyone else for that matter. Regardless of the number of innocent civilians that have been killed.
2007-02-02 13:53:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by K. Marx iii 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
No...even then they (like those who have alreadyanswered here) will want to join hands with them and sing kum-bay-yah and go skipping off into the sunset of peace and harmony. This is because they really believe there is absolutely no fundamental difference between evil men and Americans.
2007-02-02 13:58:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Gary E 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
So you think the Shia/Sunni fight will come here? I think Al-Queda can still operate no matter the outcome in Iraq. Why are'nt we in Pakistan getting Bin-Laden?
2007-02-03 08:18:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by popeyethesadist 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
very few might desire to have study this questions and intensely few responded it inspite of the shown fact that i'm additionally between them a citizen of united states earlier an Indian as we can not stay a citizen of two international locations by using fact being American resident we are no longer any further Indian yet we can bypass to our mom land for ever and are loose to stay there too loosing all reward if we live longer i think of , each physique loves peace and hate a place the place there is not any risk-free practices . when I see terrorism is a international concern each physique might desire to play his or her place . whilst Malala a muslim lady can combat for coaching of ladies folk ,whilst a newborn needs his or her freedom a terrorist lives in terror and not loose from its consequences ,an afternoon could come whilst people could come forward to wipe it from human minds besides the undeniable fact that this is purely too overdue already , there are such lots of potential of destruction to wipe entire humanity if needed action isn't taken quicker . i'm too small to take any action ,yet all type of violent videos might desire to be removed from media so as that we don't have get entry to to them by using any potential . people can lease those styles of flicks for couple dollars and arise to combat with kinfolk then to next neighbor then at artwork then someplace at paying for mall ,then everywhere he does not think of spectacular led to by potential of media and supplies he can get entry to from cafes and famous individual dollar who provide this freedom so actual . Then we strive to calm the recommendations that's already bombarded with plenty unfavorable suggestions around the international .
2016-12-16 19:55:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are not for preemptive they are for retaliatory or defensive only! So the answer is yes then it will be a law enforcement mater not a military one!... "i hate Jane Fonda"!
2007-02-02 13:54:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by no one here gets out alive 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i agree with the pre emptive strike. the democrats' policies are basically telling us to 'sit and wait here for terrorists to strike' and THEN they'll do something abt it. too late...
2007-02-02 14:04:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by duh 3
·
0⤊
0⤋