2007-02-02 13:06:58 · 6 answers · asked by girls_loud17 1 in Education & Reference ➔ Other - Education
Yes. Congress is supposed to do what is best for society.. If that means blocking social networking so that people become smarter, then so be it. Why should computer resources be wasted on social networking when it could be used on more productive things.
2007-02-02 13:10:50 · answer #1 · answered by T-Roc 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
colleges can block in spite of they pick - it has no longer some thing to do with congress. similar with libraries, that is a community situation. Librarians might want to be feisty so be careful about telling them what to do. in the experience that they imagine social networking is disruptive to the library and hogs factors then they received't enable it. otherwise they'll tell the authorities to shove it in the experience that they warfare and end them from permitting it.
2016-11-24 20:12:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, Congress shouldn't be in charge of what I read (sometimes I wonder if they should be in charge of the country, let alone what I read.) That's the first amendment. In the case of children, parents and not Congress should be in charge of what children read.
2007-02-03 09:17:44 · answer #3 · answered by CMM 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes they should. Social networking sights do not contain anything of value.
They could simply place the condition on public money they give.
2007-02-02 13:11:04 · answer #4 · answered by halfway 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That would go against the First Amendment to the Constitution.
2007-02-02 13:09:13 · answer #5 · answered by M L 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
That would be the equivalent of "blocking" the right to read certain books.
2007-02-02 13:15:12 · answer #6 · answered by ICG 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋