English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Clearly it is worth sacrificing thousands more of our brave soldiers to spare Bush a little embarrassment. Once again, Rush was dead on when he predicted that the Democrats would have the nerve to put our troops' lives above W's tender feelings. The nerve of those Democrats. They should be barred from ever serving in government.

2007-02-02 09:16:18 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

7 answers

Well, it's not the *worst* consequence of withdrawing from Iraq. In fact, for some of us it would be mighty satisfying. That said -- WHY NOT FOLLOW THE IRAQ STUDY GROUP'S PROPOSALS??? Sheesh.

I do agree with you that many of the Democrats (and mind you, many of the Republicans, like Chuck Hagel of Neb.) do indeed seem to hold the value of our troops lives in pretty high esteem, and in doing that, DO support our troops. That's the kind of nerve I like to see in government.

2007-02-02 09:21:08 · answer #1 · answered by Vaughn 6 · 0 0

I give you an A for sarcasm. The reality is that we'll be in Iraq for decades to come. Let's just absorb that fact shall we?

2007-02-02 17:43:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The worst consequence of our leaving Iraq prematurely is a mountain of dead people that would make what we have now look like a tea party. But the libs entire existence is predicated on taking a chunk out of Bush whenever possible. If death and destruction follow, so be it. (see Hanoi Jane remarks at rally).
ATTENTION IRAQI WOMEN-THE DEMS ARE NOT YOUR FRIENDS. THEY CONTINUOUSLY SUPPORT AN ENEMY WHO REGARD YOU AS NO MORE THEN CATTLE. JANE FONDA, SUSAN SARANDON, AND NANCY PELOSI HAVE THEIRS. TOUGH LUCK FOR YOU.

2007-02-02 17:32:39 · answer #3 · answered by Rich S 4 · 0 2

Fragile ego. You get this from what source? No other president ever put men at risk? Sorry you are so narrow minded and easily led by silly idealist.

2007-02-02 17:18:51 · answer #4 · answered by Jimfix 5 · 0 1

Yes - let's not sacrifice any soldiers to fight the terrorists in the mideast there - let's bring them home - where the terrorists will follow and then we can sacrifice civilians as the terrorists attack us on our own ground.

2007-02-02 17:43:27 · answer #5 · answered by lifesajoy 5 · 0 1

i DONT THINK MR BUSH IS WORRYING TO MUCH ABOUT WHAT PEOPLE THINK OF HIM.
HE KNOWS YOUR LOVING PEOPLE BUT IM AFRAID DR PHIL CANT FIX THIS ONE.
ITS VERY HARD FOR THE WESTERN WORLD TO UNDERSTAND THE SHI A INSURGENTS DO NOT THINK OR LOVE LIKE WE DO.
OUR DESTRUCTION IS VITAL TO THEIR SURVIVAL
THE ONLY MAN THAT CAN MAKE THEM OBEY IS THE POOR CONFUSED IRANIAN LEADER.
HE CAN CALL THEM HOME TO IRAN AND THEY WILL GO.
BUT IRAN DOESNT WANT THEM EITHER.
BUSH SHOULD ASK HIM TO TAKE THEM IF HE WANTS TO SPARE THEM. IF NOT - THEY HAVE TO GO

2007-02-02 17:47:18 · answer #6 · answered by jumpin0jack0flash 3 · 0 2

Democrats will cause more deaths from their sheer ignorance. They are playing a game of Russian roulette the its the American people who will lose.

2007-02-02 17:19:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers