I have only one thing.
Many of the people I know, I SWEAR haven't fully evolved yet.
You probably know one or two yourself.
2007-02-02 09:03:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Khalin Ironcrow 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
When you believe something the responsibility is on you to prove what you believe, not on others to prove that it is incorrect. To me nothing has ever been presented to me that caries much weight. Even if evolutionists could prove that evolution could be true it still would not prove that it is true. At best it would be one possible way that it could have happened. But since no one was there no one could ever really know for sure that is what did happen and so it will always be a theory and require faith to believe in it. There have been four or five main proofs presented to me to "prove" evolution.
1. Darwins charts. Darwin started drawing charts of how single celled creatures became more and more complex and eventually developed into the creatures that we have today. It is a highly developed theory, but is totally based on speculation and conjecture, and so not really scientifically accurate.
2. Dating methods. These sound extremely impressive, but in actuality are extremely inaccurate. Also scientists seem to have a habitual habit of discarding resuts that do not prove what they want to prove and accepting data that supports their theory. Whatever good is in the process is lost in the biases of those doing it.
3. Strata. They date fossils by the rock strata that the fossils are found in. But they also date the rock strata by the fossils that are found in them. So the reasoning is entirely ciruclar and really proves nothing. Also they do not have any places where the theory of strata actually works like it should.
4. DNA development. Evolutionist try and prove that DNA is the source of life, but since caskets are full of DNA it really is only a "way out idea" at this time.
5. Fossils that appear to... A lot of emphasis is placed on fossils that appear to have appendages or similar things that could develop into limbs in future animls etc, but that is really just guess work.
Any way the bottom line is I don't see anything that proves anything. When you pick up a fossil all it proves is that you have a fossil. Everything beyond that is based on evidence, and as I have listed here that evidence is either circular reasoning, speculation, unreliable evidence, or just guesses.
Hope this helps you to understand why some of us are pretty skeptical on what evolutionists are saying to us.
2007-02-02 09:27:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by oldguy63 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you want to take God out of it or just not the simple answer that He did it well, Gen 1:26 tell me what I need to know.
I would ask you...what do you believe about evolution being true? all the half answers and gusstaments don't equal the truth.
big bang, everything I have ever seen crash into or exploide was destrution not creation.
No bones have EVER been found to support the theory of evolution. If anyone says that I'd like to see a link to the site. There is not one thing I have ever seen heard that validated it (evolution) as being true.
Good luck On your search!
2007-02-02 09:11:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by CJ 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
In the evolution model, where does intelligence come from.
Why are there not more species of animals capable of:
Complex speech?
Making complex tools?
Of holding an intelligent conversation?
Why did man develop a so much higher level of intelligence than apes if we came from the same ancestors?
In my opinion, Intelligence is where the whole evolution thing really falls apart. Not to mention the astronomical odds against everything coming together in just the right manner in order to accidentally produce life.
2007-02-02 09:10:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by rbarc 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, i'm not frantic, yet convinced, you do desperately decide on to coach your self. Your first situation is that you don't understand the form between abiogenesis and evolution. Your 2d situation is that you're so emotionally wrapped up contained in the fairy tale of creation, you'll not enable your self to objectively pay interest to an evidence of evolution. i'm now unlikely to waste my time on you. ok, I relent. i will grant you with one element: you're difficult the acknowledgement of evolution with Darwin's idea of ways evolution works -- the mechanism. Darwin grow to be the first to signify an evolutionary mechanism that grow to be extensively known via others. regardless of the indisputable fact that, the concept, idea, and acknowledgement of evolution is going again a lot added than Christianity. The Greeks were conscious of it. Oh, and Roger: have you ever examine a e book except the Bible?
2016-12-03 09:08:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, evolution has never been disproved.
Darwinism breaks down into two main parts...
Common Descent: now irrefutable since the genome was unscrambled...we know that humans share genes with bananas and bacteria.
Natural Selection: the other strand of Darwinism has been subjected to countless field and laboratory tests, Darwins finches in the Galapagos have been studied for decades now ...Darwin is not in trouble, together with the fossil record it makes evolution pretty unassailable, we have sufficient evidence to believe in evolution without resorting to faith. What have the other side got to present as evidence?
2007-02-02 09:12:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by CHEESUS GROYST 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
When you say "evolution" do you mean evolution in the sense that we see happening around us with species adapting to their surrounding, or evolution in the sense of Darwinism, that we all came from, "evolved" from single cell organisms? There is quite a bit of difference between the two. One has scientific proof based on accepted scientific methods behind it, and the other is a atheists theory on trying to disprove God that has no valid scientific evidence behind it.
A word on common descent. Of course we all share similar DNA, God created us all (including animals and plants) out of the same material. I can take some clay, and make a little monkey, a banana tree and a man, all out of the same material. What God did that no one else can is he gave them life.
2007-02-02 09:06:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Deus Luminarium 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Evolution is true and is supported by the fossil record with the exception that Darwin proposed a continuing gradual evolution. The fossil record actually shows that evolution occassionaly makes dramatic leaps.
Too bad most people think evolution and spirituality are opposing concepts. Evolution is our word for our understanding of God's process of creation. God planted the seeds of natural laws and evolution is the flowering and unfolding of his plan.
2007-02-02 09:06:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Elmer R 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
The Cambrian Explosion.
Was it a real phenomenon, or just an artifact of us not finding good preserved fossils from before that time?
If it was real, was there some mechanism for exchanging the "biomineralization genes" between very different organisms?
Of course, a "we don't know what happened" is very different from a "God did it."
2007-02-02 09:28:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Whatever they say, evolution theory is now and still a theory, and as a theory, according to its meaning, has never been refuted and is supported empirically.
You tell them to go and e-mail Richard Dawkins
One of my favorites: "Evolution happens by chance."
Edit: They are saying that humans evolved from laboring and that can't be right.
- Let's say, they are really dumb at math, but they practice and practice and eventually got better. That's called laboring with a brain
2007-02-02 09:01:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by FAUUFDDaa 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Hon, most of the people who look in this section are trying like hell to justify why they believe in a supernatural being, and are afraid to admit that it is all a fairytale, silly, and naive.... Let's face it, to believe that something made all this, in the face of the knowledge we have now, is just plane retarded and just contrary to experience....... Read the best seller out called "The God Delusion". You will come away truly educated in philosophy and theology.... If I were to have written it, I would have made the language a bit less complicated, but...... It is now in paperback, and available anywhere, and one of the best non-fiction books written in the last year
2007-02-02 09:19:01
·
answer #11
·
answered by April 6
·
0⤊
1⤋