the blunder of macro evolution?

Question

there was a finding dubbed the nebraska man, in which started because a tooth was found, miles away a few more bones fragments were found and then with wild imagination a supposed half man half ape was constructed, this friends is how science puts these things together the lack of integrity from certain scientists to promote their false views concerning origin on everyone. Is was shortly later that it was discovered that this was a pigs tooth and the other bones were unrelated. Tell me friends where oh where is the half man half monkey, oh I know of a few that are put together in the same way this one was, but why is the ape still here today and the man and no half ape half man, if billions of years where are the billions not a few hundred half man half ape fossils besides we know how these get put together and that even today we have genetic deformities and midgets so that even in the case of an old fossil that was small its doesnt show anything new, where oh where are the billions?

oh let me guess, where is my god, well he is everywhere and not limited to time and space and he is the savior and lives in the hearts of those who he has saved through jesus christ. wont you accept him today friends, stop believing another lie of man.

Answer 1

The hoax that you pointed out was found to be such by peer review. You see science has no bias. It is simply a search for truth. There is no agenda to the ToE. There is only a search.

Can your beliefs hold up to such scrutiny?

Answer 2

Your question shows a clear lack of understanding about Evolution theory. What you've effectively done is created a strawman of your own design, which you've torn apart.

The reason why apes still exist is because not all environmental changes affect the entire Earth at the same time. There are obviously some environments where an ape may have an advantage over humans. Humans aren't terribly good moving around in trees, for example.

Furthermore, evolution does not say humans evolved from apes - merely that the two share a common ancestor.

Answer 3

It sound like the way the bible was put together. A few sayings from Babylon, a belief or two from Egypt, grab a bit of Greek and Roman myths. Voila, a new religion. It worked for Jews, Christians, Muslims, Mormons, Scientologists, all those crazy quilt cults.

The difference is that when someone points out the flaws of Nebraska Man (or Piltdown Man), science says, "you're right, we're wrong" - not "get the pyre ready, we've got another heretic over here".

Answer 4

First of all, not everything that lives becomes a fossil. Second, the "half-ape, half man" as you describe it, most likely was competing against early humans in its later days for resources, so natural selection made its choice. Third, any real scientist would immediately discard the "Nebraska man" just on the notion that it was found in Nebraska.

Answer 5

If you believe in micro evolution than you believe in macro evolution. You have no sources to your make believe story. And even so can you blame one persons fault for thousands of discoveries. You are biased to your belief and spend so much time trying to disprove it you only come up with ridiculous stuff such as this.

Bones decompose at fast rates unless they are found in a cave or tar pit etc... inbreed knowledge makes you sound very uneducated. If you are going to bash something learn about it.

Answer 6

Ok,

We know there are such things as fake money, bogus checks, counterfeit credit cards, forged passports; do the existence of those bogus items invalidate the world economic system?

Fake evidences only disprove their own validity; if the theory is supported by other evidences -- and in the case of evolution, there is plenty of those -- then the theory still stands.


Charles Darwin rocked!

Answer 7

Has anyone ever stopped to consider the control satan might have had on the beasts? We already know how much he likes to control us humans. This is not supported by scripture, that I can determine as of yet, but it is a thought made in awareness.

Answer 8

So one faulty hypothesis invalidates all of evolution?

Ok, so a single murdering preacher or child molesting catholic or nutcase christian fundie logically also invalidates all of christianity.

Thanks for pointing that out for us.

Answer 9

Right..

It's more logical to believe in the man-from-monkey delusion (more plausible) than the god delusion (fantasy).

Answer 10

I believe Charles Darwin. Jesus is a lie.

Thanks.