English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

19 answers

It is one of a few times in history where the Federal government illegally used the military against American citizens. It was not a decision of the FBI. It was a decision of President Bill Clinton's attack pitbull, Janet Reno.

Kent State anyone?

No, Koresh and his followers did not deserve to be burned alive.

2007-02-02 06:43:01 · answer #1 · answered by TubeDude 4 · 3 1

NOPE.

He had coffee at the same coffee shop every day and often chatted with the police. They could have grabbed him there.

He often repaired their guns for them.

No idea why Janet R put the finger on him and MURDERED all those people.

Illegal Tank was used - Poison gas that was outlawed by the United Nations and the USA..

I still wonder who it could be that was being shown what can happen if........?

PS= I am still wondering why they destroyed ALL the evidence in such short order after they filmed what they wanted to show on the media..

2007-02-02 14:45:02 · answer #2 · answered by whynotaskdon 7 · 3 1

He deserved jail for sure. Maybe it the whole truth could be known, maybe death. The FBI should have been dealt with severely for their roll in this. Their unprofessional zeal for action cost the lives of many "innocent" women and children.

2007-02-02 14:34:42 · answer #3 · answered by DATA DROID 4 · 3 1

Nope, I believe the ATF had a statement to make because they were about to be disbanded by the government. Also " drop the Chalupa" Reno always had an itchy trigger finger.

2007-02-02 15:08:06 · answer #4 · answered by Gorilla 6 · 1 1

Hmm. I think the dude was up to some wack stuff, that maybe he should have been put in the slam for. I think the guv WAY OVERREACTED and did OVERKILL on the assault of the "compound". The innocents didn't need to be killed. We may not approve of the way people think and live, but if they are keeping to themselves, and not harming children (the catch) then adults should be left to their own devices as long as they leave the rest of us out of it.

2007-02-02 14:43:08 · answer #5 · answered by justbeingher 7 · 2 1

You must not have your facts straight. David Koresh killed his followers and himself. The ATF had nothing to do with that. You should go by facts -- not what the media feeds you. I live in the area where it happened. I know what really happened.

2007-02-02 14:39:38 · answer #6 · answered by Justsyd 7 · 0 4

No, what he did was not worthy of death, but I believe they could have gotten other charges against him.

It was the ATF that surrounded the compound.
He was accused of firearms violations.

grace2u

2007-02-02 14:40:37 · answer #7 · answered by Theophilus 6 · 2 1

You don't know much about Waco or Branch Dravidian do you?
There were criminals ,outstanding warrants for fraud, sexual abuse, outstanding loan payments.
koresh had brainwashed his congregation to his sickness;; the same as jim jones; and his followers in Guiana; ubl;; sadar and islam; hammas; hezbollah; taliban; al qita and many others.

2007-02-02 15:07:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

NO HE DID NOT NO ONE DOES BUT THEN AGAIN JUST ANOTHER BLOOD STAIN ON THE HALLS OF JUSTICE IN THIS COUNTRY..... WE USED TO HAVE SOMETHING IN THIS COUNTRY CALLED THE BILL OF RIGHTS NOW LOOK A GROUP OF PEOPLE GET KILLED BECAUSE GOV WERE TRYING TO FORCE THEM TO SHOW PERMITTS ON GUNS THAT WERE LEGAL AND ANOTHER FREEDOM HE HAD RIGHT OR WRONG IN OUR EYES WAS THE FREEDOM OF RELIGON PLAIN AND SIMPLE THE FBI HAD NO RIGHT THERE THEY KNOW IT AS WE ALSO KNOW IT

2007-02-02 14:42:23 · answer #9 · answered by THE WAR WRENCH 4 · 2 1

No, but he wouldn't come out, so he didn't get a trial. None of those that died deserved it.IT was like shooting fish in a barrel.

2007-02-02 14:42:20 · answer #10 · answered by ? 7 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers