A friend was arrested by the police for an alleged crime, and they told me I could pick her up for $40. I asked if that was the bond or bail, and they said it was "the fee".
They only accepted cash, they didn't give me a receipt, and I asked if that money gets returned to me when she is proven innocent and they told me no.
I was told I was waiting for the bondsman to show up. I asked again and was told the money not a bond, but a "fee".
What the heck did I just pay for? I thought when you get arrested and want be released you get two option; pay the bond or pay the bail.
So my questions are:
1) Did I pay a bond instead of a "fee"?
2) Is it legal for a police department to only offer you the option of a bond and not allow you to opt for the full bail? If no, do I have recourse to sue to get my money back since I wasn't offer the chance to pay bail?
Seems like the Constitution and the Bill of Rights are just two pieces of paper in the way of police departments getting extra revenue
2007-02-02
05:19:48
·
2 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law Enforcement & Police
I was told it was a "fee", not a bond payment.
I specifically asked if I could pay the BAIL, and was given a look by the desk clerk that suggested I was dumber than a rock. He told me that I must not be understanding him, and that the money to be given was "not bond nor bail" but rather a "fee" that "was NOT refunded nor refundable".
Then they called in a bondsman that I had to wait an hour for. But yet I was told no BOND was being placed, and just a FEE was being levied, so what need is there of a bondsman to be there?
So okay, maybe perhaps the POLICE aren't getting the money. Maybe the BONDSMAN is. But is there any legitimate reason to try to deceive me about a bond being instead a "fee", and refusing me to allow to post the full bail myself? The only reason that seems like they would want me to post bond instead of bail would be to support the bondsman, which is equally immoral/unethical/illegal.
2007-02-02
06:38:22 ·
update #1