2007-02-02 05:06:10 · 8 answers · asked by everyone 1 in Environment
You're confusing weather (short term and local) with climate (long term and widespread).
If a scientist did that at an IPCC meeting, first they'd laugh at him. Then they'd take him off the project.
By the way, I'm from Denver. And I'm very worried about global warming.
2007-02-02 05:17:06 · answer #1 · answered by Bob 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You and that i the two be attentive to it particularly relies upon on the beginning and end factor. AGW proponents want to apply the 1970's as their beginning factor, or the previous due 1870's. Why? because of the fact those have been sessions the place the temp develop into bottoming out. So any line beginning at this factor might clearly flow up. So why do you cry foul while the AGW skeptics use archives to teach their area? variety of like the chinese language gymnast calling different gymnast cheaters. The particularly humorous element is that everybody is familiar with of there develop right into a sprint ice age that ended interior the 1860's (all different than Micheal "The rip-off" Mann). So the question is, popping out of an ice age, how lots could we heat? to this point some million degree. looks approximately appropriate to me. As for NASA archives, that is now no longer solid. Hansen has destroyed any credibility that business enterprise had while is is composed of AGW. heavily, why might you're able to desire to "adjust" temps? How approximately decommisioning those that desire "changes".
2016-11-02 03:29:55 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
haha very funny
yeah- the earth will still have "winter" for a while - but when talking about global warming, even a 1 degree mean/average global increase will mean the end of life as we know it-
on the plus side though : florida, the dumbazzes who clusterf***ed their way in 2000 into giving us the malignant retard Bush and his cadre of scumbags as Presidunce - will soon be completely under water, as will mississippi, alabama and georgia - hell most of the southern "red states"
on second thought - good riddance - bring on the global warming - maybe it's God's second "Flood" to get rid of the evil scum - in this case, the GOP
2007-02-02 05:14:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well! Global cooling will be the repurcussion of the nuclear catastrophe on earth .
The earth will be covered by vast smokes and radiations,thereby disallowing any heat radiation to *** inside. The state will be then "NUCLEAR WINTER".
And ofcourse,ppl are concerned abt that too but since we know that when this will occur,nobody will be alive to witness this.,hence not much uproar
2007-02-02 05:12:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope, I don't care if it gets cold :-) that just means more snow.
I don't worry about global warming either, environmentalists already waste too much time worrying about something that they can't stop.
2007-02-02 05:15:29 · answer #5 · answered by kirdro 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it was -18 F below in Denver,Co early this morning ,a new record low..I don't think anyone in Denver is worried about global warming,except when is it going to get to Denver.
2007-02-02 05:11:18 · answer #6 · answered by Dfirefox 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no. earth is becoming warm overall.
youre just feeling the cool side of it.
2007-02-02 05:09:25 · answer #7 · answered by billa42000 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not really.
2007-02-02 05:11:45 · answer #8 · answered by Jerry P 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋