English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-02 01:46:51 · 35 answers · asked by mex_tario 1 in Family & Relationships Singles & Dating

35 answers

Definitely not. It's not "wrong" at all. Lots of people are virgins at that age, but few will admit it, cause it's not "cool" to be a virgin.

2007-02-02 01:50:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There is nothing wrong with being a virgin at 20...really...there was a previous question about a month back that asked something similar, see if u can check it out

2007-02-02 01:50:30 · answer #2 · answered by mrimtoocoolforyou 2 · 0 0

No it's not. There is nothing wrong with holding on to your virginity especially during these times. It's scary to have sex with or without protection. People lie and you have to be sure. Take your time and wait until the right person comes along. There is a reason why you've waited this long. God bless.

2007-02-02 01:51:33 · answer #3 · answered by krispykreme335 2 · 0 0

If it's right for you, then it can't be wrong. It's no body's business if you're a virgin or not. There's nothing wrong with it. Personally I admire you ladies who can abstain more than you'll ever know. I once had an English teacher in high school who died a virgin. She always told us that she was a virgin by choice, we always remarked the choice wasn't hers (you know how cruel kids can be).

Keep up the good work and stick to your feelings.

2007-02-02 01:55:27 · answer #4 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 1 1

Nope - I lost my virginity when I was 20. Just wait until you meet the right person and the time is right for you.

2007-02-02 01:50:32 · answer #5 · answered by lunasage 6 · 0 0

Virginity is not important.... If you're a virgin or not, it shouldnt matter!!! you are not a material... when do you feel ready for making love then you should have it. What does marriage mean??? its like somebody will let you to do something after a simple signature... YOU ARE NOT A MATERIAL... How a man does it?? What you've got different ???

2007-02-02 01:51:56 · answer #6 · answered by :( 4 · 0 0

My b/f was a virgin til he was 20. There is nothing wrong with that!!

2007-02-02 01:49:56 · answer #7 · answered by Kimmie 3 · 0 0

that may not incorrect in any respect through fact if your not waiting it incredibly is ur selection in it incredibly is sturdy what ur like that and that i say this through fact your not attempting to place itself in threat for something you do not desire and when I say that u do not desire any of those illnesses out right here or a toddler that u wont be able to look after sturdy financially so do not rush it different persons opinion shouldn't strategies now and back i prefer i substitute into nonetheless a virgin surely through fact back im youthful and im lots youthful then u im 17 n i've got faith sorry approximately having intercourse so quickly yet im merely chuffed i did not get not something undesirable and by ur staying abstinence your doing //making a sturdy selection don't be like a number of those adult adult males out right here

2016-10-16 11:02:30 · answer #8 · answered by groover 4 · 0 0

What could possibly be wrong with being pure and clean? I'm a lot older than that and wish I could say PROUDLY that I was a virgin.

2007-02-02 01:49:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No It is not wrong and I wish more people would make that choice to wait I think it is great and don't worry what others think it is totally up to you to decide when the time is right for you.

2007-02-02 02:23:44 · answer #10 · answered by regina g 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers