The global warming deniers are offering $10,000 payments to any scientists who will dispute the IPCC report.
http://news.monstersandcritics.com/uk/news/article_1254871.php/Scientists_offered_cash_to_dispute_climate_change_study_-_report
2007-02-02 01:46:35 · 10 answers · asked by Bob 7 in Environment
I don't know how you can keep denying global warming. It's totally happening and a study showed that Americans are the least concerned/informed about it. I've heard about it since I was little, but the subject was often glossed over during science class time. I feel a bit ashamed to be living in America now, since we've contributed to much of the greenhouse gases. But can you blame us when we have a government that likes to sweep it under the rug? Most people who deny global warming are big companies who emit those harmful gases. They have more than $10,000 in their pockets to offer!!!
2007-02-02 01:58:59 · answer #1 · answered by keonli 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hey, researchers get grant money to prove/disprove theories all the time. The only time it makes news is when it goes against the politically correct interpretation of the subject...in this case global warming.
That's why when ANY study comes out, you need to dig below the surface findings...who funded it, is this the ONLY time the finding came out this way, what were the controls, how big a sampling, how long did the study go one, were other variables considered, etc.
Too many people don't take that extra step.
2007-02-02 01:57:31 · answer #2 · answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmm. Now THAT is an easy way to make $10K. How difficult is it to point out that the IPCC "science" is to vehemently state that jostling a thermometer to change it's mercurly level will alter the temperature in a room. Anthropogenic global warming---proof that a mind is a terrible thing to waste.
2007-02-02 02:29:00 · answer #3 · answered by Dr.T 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you have defined Al Gore. Reject the means guzzling mansion and preaching. The earth has classes of heat temperature and chilly over 1000's of years, so any organic phenomenon should not be preached against and a modest living house might use much less means.
2016-10-16 11:02:27 · answer #4 · answered by groover 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I didn't hear about that but I hope the scientist will refuse it because its true global warming is happening.
2007-02-02 01:51:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Pathetic.
2007-02-02 01:50:51 · answer #6 · answered by NikNak 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They should use the money to make the environment a better place to live.
2007-02-02 01:57:03 · answer #7 · answered by Kimora Miranda 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are many scientist who say it is cyclic and has nothing to do with man. Al failed to pay them off.
2007-02-02 01:51:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
LOL
are we all human beings? really?
2007-02-02 01:52:44 · answer #9 · answered by carmenl_87 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is that all ?
2007-02-02 01:49:55 · answer #10 · answered by Gene 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋