Could artifical blood be used to stop bacteria from quorum sensing and thus infection?

Answer 1

if you're asking if you could replace the blood and dilute out the autoinducers, then the answer is no. the bacteria would just keep pumping them out, so you'd basically have to be continually flushing the system.

also worth noting that many infections don't involve quorum sensing, and of those that do, many are tissue infections and not septicemia. replacing someones blood will not affect the quorum sensing going on by the p. aeruginosa and b. cepacia in their lungs.

finally, current research is showing that something called "biphasic stability" takes place in quorum sensing. in short, a culture was grown up and induced with AIs, then the AIs were removed and the culture continued to express genes under control of the quorum sensing response (it hasn't been published yet so i can't give a reference at this time).

Answer 2

Fossil record - undemanding - no sparkling transitional sort has ever been stumbled on (besides the reality that it is so lots greater complicated than that). How do you clarify punctuated equilibrium, the Cambrian explosion, residing fossils, shark fossils stumbled on on mountains, and so on. Endogenous retroviruses and quorum sensing - i don't be conscious of what those are. yet what i be conscious of is that there has never been a mutation stumbled on that provides any quantity of genetic tips to a species. What you notice in virus and micro organism substitute is determination of latest tips. it incredibly is a reallly, incredibly short precis of the info.

Answer 3

I don't think it possible to infuse enough artificial blood to do that. It may help slow quorum sensing, with a massive infusion, but not stop it.