2007-02-01 17:55:15 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
esther- you dumbo. how could i ask this question without internet you pathetic woman. i bet your one of the first to buy vista. i hope you get everything in life and rot in hell, you could have given that money to a child who dies in africa.....
2007-02-01 18:01:20 · update #1
lou- you pimp.
2007-02-01 18:01:44 · update #2
troll bomb- im not saying theres a heaven. if you were poor then would you not want someone to help you. rather its a pathetic excuse to steal money from people (microsoft). you already have xp which is sufficient.... you wont exactly die without vista will you.... well some of you might.... geeks!!!
2007-02-01 18:04:05 · update #3
deazone- i agree, someone should not buy a vista copy but donate the 400$ to you lol
2007-02-01 19:33:14 · update #4
doug lawrence- xp is better that vista. win 98 is better than xp. and thats a fact.
2007-02-01 19:34:06 · update #5
Ouch.. that hurts.
2007-02-01 17:57:49 · answer #1 · answered by ManhattanGirl 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Another "Simple Minded" Question the $400 Payment for Vista is a "Once only" Payment --- the Donation of $400 as you suggest is pointless -- of all the $Billions freely Given the result is that the More Given the More "Poor" we seem to Aquire --- Perhaps if the "Leaders" of the "Poor" stopped Stealing the vast sums "Donated" and used it for it,s intended Purpose Silly Suggestions such as the One you make would not be Required ???????
2007-02-01 20:24:30 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
John 12:8
2007-02-01 18:03:06 · answer #3 · answered by ! 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
People make the mistake that they can buy their way into heaven.
There are people in the world that prey upon our guilt and take advantage of our best intentions. The admonition to give to the poor (Matthew 19:21) should be exactly that, TO THE POOR. Giving your money to a front that will consume it, is waste, and vain.
2007-02-01 17:58:46 · answer #4 · answered by great gig in the sky 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bill Gates gives an enormous amount to charity anyway.
But personally I wouldn't pay $400 for Vista to do what I do already.
2007-02-01 20:07:56 · answer #5 · answered by mesun1408 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Donating money to the poor will not enhance my computation ability. Buying Vista probably would. End of story.
2007-02-01 17:58:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I just donated a brand new copy of Vista to a poor, homeless geek, who had an outdated operating system on his notebook computer.
Are you happy now?
2007-02-01 19:04:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hell no, I am not buying it. I will either pirate it or continue using Linux. As for the $400, it goes to me. I can not feed the poor lest I become one of them.
2007-02-01 19:07:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
People usually justify it with " They would only buy food and eat it - then it would be gone!"
My new VISTA in the computer will last me years!
YUK, but true.
2007-02-01 17:59:27 · answer #9 · answered by whynotaskdon 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Hey, yeah. Get off the computer, give the poor your internet connection fee! Oh, ooops sorry. You're pointing the finger elsewhere......
2007-02-01 17:57:25 · answer #10 · answered by Esther 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Why, do they have desktops that need vista?
2007-02-01 17:58:36 · answer #11 · answered by D 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋