English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

considering all the alliances involved (NATO, DPRK-Venezuela-Cuba alliance, etc), and the fact that alliances among powers such as these led to WWI, the instability of the Middle East and our oil supplies, increasing numbers of nuclear weapons, distrust among one another, and rogue nations unwilling to listen to the U.N.,

will we have another world war? and considering technology today, will the losses be even greater? is the doomsday clock actually right?

2007-02-01 17:50:36 · 24 answers · asked by some_random_guy61 4 in Politics & Government Military

24 answers

Their state propaganda sure does a lot to foster hate. Socialists specialize in the use of 'focused hatred' as a political tool. Che Guevara wrote about this practice.

You correctly point out that the nastiest of nations are obtaining the nastiest of weapons. The outcome of that is inevitable.

They will not demonstrate the same restraint as the 'mature' nations ahve.

2007-02-01 17:55:03 · answer #1 · answered by speakeasy 6 · 0 3

Not sure i understand your question.
However i think you are asking (why don't those countries dis- agree with our way of life?)

I personally can not justify nor speak for any of those four countries that you ask about.
I will answer your question in the following manner:
The U.S.A. is a super power, it has been since they exploded the nuclear bombs on two Japanese Cities(1945). But the power of the U.S. or it's supporters has been building since 1913 as we know it today. (Money talks boo **** walks) with all them Billionaires and such talking and the armies of the U.S. backing their decisions we will win over the others)

All eyes and ears are tuned in with all and any major moves that we act on or fail to act on. If the U.S.A. catches a cold; the whole world feels the same pain.

Every country in the world has tried to dominate the peoples of the world; and have failed up to today. However there has been only one nation that has made it a reality to control the people of the world and that has been the U.S.A.

We are the worlds leader and official world police as well. The world will act and do as we say they should or else.

I believe that is why we are hated; for we pose a threat towards their form of government.

2007-02-09 10:55:55 · answer #2 · answered by jose r 7 · 0 0

First of all, the sanctions put on Cuba are for reasons that no one under 50 years of age are even aware of. Cuba got what it deserved. In respect to that, some of those sanctions have been lifted.
While I think the Doomsday clock is accurate, I seriously doubt that we are is as bad a state as some would like to believe that we are. Governments change, and their policies change. N. Korea is led by a nut case that the people may very well revolt against. Besides, a few well placed Neutron warheads and N. Korea is no longer a threat. Yes, Neutron warheads do exist. It is a warhead that produces maximum animal life kill, and minimum property damage.
WW1 came about because no one had sense enough to step in and take control of the issues at hand and to make the smaller countries behave. WW2 was about oppression, and putting an end to it. Japan, and Nazi Germany started something that they should never have started because they did not have the means to sustain a war.
Yes, there will be another major war. Whether it will be a world war or not remains to be seen. There will be one in the Middle East. Those who start it, will not get to finish it because most of the armies will be wiped out by natural means before they even get to Israel.
Our oil thing is not as bad as people would like to make it out to be. There are alternatives that the people can do for themselves, IF they want to. The problem is that they don't want to. Our oil problem is the fault of the people and our complacency.

2007-02-01 18:12:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The only reason boils down to foreign policy. When you see that more and more nations are alligning themselves against you means that your foreign policy is not working at all. When you label some nations as "Axis of Evil" or "Terrorists", that is foreign policy practiced at its worst. The "Cold War" had been a far more dangereous period than it is now, yet a major conflict between the world powers was averted because diplomacy and foreign policy was practiced at its best on both sides. The rule was to negotiate and talk with your enemies. Know their point of view and the extent they will respond to your actions and vice versa. In this way, you will know your enemies even more, and you can gauge the enemy's expected response to your your actions. This is totally absent in today's power relationships. There's no diplomacy at all. Every action is done through rhetorical threats and intimidation, with the outcome that the enemy's response is totally unpredictable. This is very dangerous to both sides. Will it lead to small conflicts or to a full-blown regional or global war?. Which nations will be neutral, which nations take sides with your enemy, and which nations will become your allies?. Without any diplomacy or good foreign policy, you'll be kept in the dark to answer these questions. The chances are, you'll be faced with unexpected surprises.

2007-02-02 05:27:00 · answer #4 · answered by roadwarrior 4 · 0 0

We are already in World War III and the stakes are economic and geographic. The cost in human life is already staggering and the weapons used have been "conventional", not weapons of mass destruction. The economic cost is easily seen in todays global economy and the potential threats to it's stability. The geographic threat is that of groups trying to take over governments and peoples ideologies hence destroying whta these people know as "home" and the lives they've come to know as a norm.
For instance, many Muslims have moved, of their own free will, from Islamic countruies to places such as Great Britain and then have the audacity to demand that their religious laws replace the already governing laws of Great Britain. The same is taking place in Canada and The United States as well as other countries.

2007-02-01 17:58:20 · answer #5 · answered by jsczerby 1 · 2 0

To answer you questions, yes it is in mankinds nature to destroy one another. We will have another World War. Will it be today or tomorrow who knows? Put this way Nuclear Weapons that United States possess have the capability of blowing up the entire earth 7 or 8 fold!

North Korea - A threat that is all talk and no action. That country outnumbers US troops in South Korea 12 to 1. North Korea has the 4th largest military force on the planet. If they wanted to invade South Korea to prove a point they would have. The United States keeps them in check with harsh sanctions. Jim Moron Kong II is so sick, he starves innocent women and children by the thousands so he can fund his Military! They will never use a projectile against the United States because China isn't going to allow that kind of threat in there backyard. It is been made politically clear that the United States will annihilate North Korea for any missile launch against the United States or foreign bases. They may sneak a dirty bomb or sell a weapon to terrorists, because that is how they make all there money to fund the 4th largest military on a postage stamp of a country! Selling missile technology on the black market!

Venezuela - They have a large supply of Oil, but there military would get be wiped off the map. That moron leader, may have a big mouth when he has a mic in front of him, but the United States still orders that country around in order to keep major oil suppliers lucrative on the market.

Iran - A leader that is hard to read. I think he is a schizo, because one day he likes America then next he hates it. Make no mistake though, if North Korea and Iran ally, things could get pretty interesting in this world. Iran is working around the clock to sell oil at a cheap price! That is why oil is cheap right now, they are trying to make money as one of the main oil distributors along with Saudi Arabia and Iraq. Iran is taking that black gold and spending money to enrich uranium into plutonium for nuclear fuel for warheads.

Cuba - They hate us because there entire population for the most part wants to be free and not under communist REIGN!

Last question - Yes the doomsday clock is ticking, is it right well no, but it will start from Iran possibly attacking Israel, or India with it's 1 billion people population escalating things with Pakistan!

2007-02-01 18:13:41 · answer #6 · answered by SKULL 4 · 2 1

shall we pass Bomb and initiate greater conflict is what you're saying? conflict monger is what it incredibly is or a minimum of feels like. in case you employ the paintings of persuasion we could get a dash farther, and be greater properly enjoyed, did Jesus say something approximately beginning a conflict no he suggested turn the different cheek, Iraq substitute into not self protection and that's additionally a reality, Dem's are continuously blocked by Repub's so they are able to't even attempt to repair, the two that or some Democrats possibly undesirable it incredibly is each and all of the greater reason to vote for somebody new like Obama who way better is conscious distant places cultures then McCain, and that i'm sorry however the wealthy could pay greater taxes you by greater stuff and use greater of the earths components you may pay for the greater advantageous Ware and tear on each little thing plus how is sticking tax costs to those who have already got it ruff going to assist them? in case you do not help wager what you gets greater crime. OBAMA is a greater robust selection each and each of ways around.

2016-10-16 10:51:49 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yes we will have another world war. However, Unless the United States gets out of the UN and gets the UN out of the United States, then we are going to be forced to fight on BOTH sides of the war and become the ultimate losers.
when a war comes along, you have to be willing to give up some of your personal; freedoms you hold so near and dear. At the top of the list is the freedom of speech. You must be willing to allow our government to make decisions based on the intelligenct they have obtained and not fight a war based on public opinion.
The generals of N. Korea and Vietnam have said for years that they would have been run out of town except that they fought the war of public opinion in the United States and won it!

2007-02-09 04:48:42 · answer #8 · answered by JPGloye 1 · 1 0

Another world war? Hopefully it'll come long after pollution takes it's effect. Recent actions haven't helped much either. Although on the other hand, technology can be turned the other way around and used to minimize unnecessary casualties. Humans may be doomed to repeat history, but we also know how to learn from our mistakes (at least some of us do)

2007-02-01 17:59:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

wow, what a deep question...the simple fact is everyone always hates the leader. We have in fact become "invincible" in a strict traditional military sense, thus a lot of disdain as been targeted at us. This of course leads to a sort of alternative type of warfare ie...nuclear, guerilla, terrorism etc etc...Honestly, I think its almost liek the WWII scenario reversed...we are begging the world to see this for what it is an now one is listening..( like the Brits where to us in WWII) So to answer the ?, I believe we will have another, if we arent already in it...how many countries have to be involved an a conflict before we cal it a world war?

2007-02-01 17:58:44 · answer #10 · answered by Jason N 2 · 2 0

Slavery of of other people to America is not correct.
That mistaken idea is controlling the US policy towards many countries
I think that that is the reason for the the destruction that US causes everywhere.
What else but hate could be the result?
The U.S. media and policy morals should be changed from Nazi racial to a human morals.

2007-02-09 10:33:51 · answer #11 · answered by imamulleith 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers