2007-02-01 12:55:07 · 15 answers · asked by Raymond S 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
If that is what the estimates for the cost of the war are, then yes.
2007-02-01 12:57:14 · answer #1 · answered by K 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, it goes to helping Iraqi infrastructure. We should be giving them loans not free money. America has work to be done domestically. We have too many problems at home to sacrifice $100 billion of tax payer dollars. We need to work on domestic security: our southern front where terrorist can sneak in, port security, and other homeland issues. If we invest $100 billion dollars in let say alternative energy. We can end terrorist financing by stopping the huge amount of money Arab nations receive. We could then raise American jobs and go from a inbalanced train budget to a balanced.
2007-02-01 13:01:28 · answer #2 · answered by slickny8111 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. That would make the Chinese jumping with joy. America's spiralling foreign debt, and enormous war spending. That increases the deficit further, and the more we owe the Chinese. If the war in Iraq goes on for many years, the more the Chinese makes the profits.
Increased spending with no tax increase?. Oh boy, that would be debt. Fellow Americans, brace yourself for the hard times ahead!!.
2007-02-01 14:17:28 · answer #3 · answered by roadwarrior 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not when this scumbag asked for another tax cut this morning, I mean if we are to truly believe that his is an important mission and that our civilization depends on our restoring stability to Iraq, why would this dingleberry ask for a tax cut in time of 'war'? Just one roll back on one of his tax cuts for the rich would more than pay for KIng George's fake war. So the answer is fu** NO.
2007-02-01 13:11:18 · answer #4 · answered by Bodhi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, it's fine to ask. If he gets turned down, whatever. Plus, if we spend the money now and win the war we wont have to spend more later, or suffer the consequences of losing more lives than we need to.
Lives are priceless. It's all well and good that people are willing to die for this country. But if these people don't have to and we spend money now instead of later then we can keep lives of the brave soldiers that are defending our rights and giving others rights that we have to others less fortunate.
2007-02-01 13:00:00 · answer #5 · answered by n0mg5 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No it's an oxy moronic thing he's doing: peace through violence.... If he really wanted to end the war, give the middle easterns money... make their life better...help Africa out... then what can the terrorists say?
2007-02-01 12:59:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. Taxpayers should have a say in how their tax dollars are spent.
I want a refund.
2007-02-01 18:24:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are a LOT of hungry kids with no health care in this country..wouldn't be nice to spend that money on them instead of blowing people to bits?!
2007-02-01 13:00:19 · answer #8 · answered by MC 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes, he is Commander In Cheif of the Armed Forces and it is his job to manage the war as he sees fit.
2007-02-01 12:59:08 · answer #9 · answered by bigsey93harrison37 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
yes, to fund the troops to to keep them alive, any amount needed is the amount tht is needed to be given
2007-02-01 14:17:42 · answer #10 · answered by fla5232 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋