What books of the bible did matthew, mark, James ect. write?

Question

I stuck on these questions and so i need to know what books matthew, mark, luke, james, peter, jude, and john wrote. please tell me the answer or give me a website i can go on for the answer. thanks! xoxo

its a question in my homework please help

Answer 1

These books of the Bible were named after the people that wrote them.

Answer 2

Short answer, nobody knows.

Long answer:

The names of Mark and Matthew were first attached to the gospels by Irenius in 180 AD. He choose four (of the many) gospels to be the key gospels, and threw the rest out. He put the four names on them.

The reasons for the names has to do with Polycarp about 70 years prior, who discussed that someone named Mark and someone named Matthew wrote stories about Jesus. However, how he describes them (around 110 AD) is much different then the gospels that bear their names today.

With Matthew, we can be fairly sure that it was not the apostle Matthew, since he relies on Mark for his version. In fact, Matthew adds very little new that Luke doesn't also add, which seems to indicated Matthew didn't personally know Jesus. Mark's version is riddled with inaccuracies about the geography of Israel, so it is very unlikely that he met Jesus either (actually, tradition says he didn't)

Since we believe James the Just died about 62 AD (according to a third-party historian), it is extremely unlikely he wrote James, though tradition says so. The reason is because the epistle clearly appears to be written in response to a letter of Paul, and because the name was attached to it very late.

The site below has tons of good reading, from all points of view.

Answer 3

all the gospel writers chosen to inform the tale in his personal way, and many of the information fluctuate slightly. Matthew and Luke both absolutely had the gospel of Mark as a hardship-loose source. (in addition they had yet another hardship-loose source, obtrusive from the parts they have in hardship-loose which do not come from Mark. it really is universal as "Q" and is lost, regardless of the reality that the parts shared via Matthew and Luke should be approximated via evaluation.) it really is available that Matthew determined on a rephrasing contained in the 0.33 man or woman (as antagonistic to direct address) because he encountered witnesses who claimed that the voice grow to be heard via others besides as Jesus, or because he had to steer away from leaving room for the rivalry that the voice grow to be in hardship-free words reported via Jesus. Matthew is slightly worried with justifying claims regarding Jesus, and tells the tale to that end. the prospect that each and each account of a narrative will agree completely is so small that it really is many times concept, in regulation enforcement circles, a stunning good foundation for suspecting that the tale grow to be faked. authentic charges do not agree that properly from one teller to a unique. What different information were lost? Who is time-honored with of? we've the tale as we've it.

Answer 4

Jesus's disciples wrote none of the books that carry their names. They were all written after the fact.

Answer 5

matthew, mark, luke, james, peter, jude, and john
See my page http://www.geocities.com/bwrobinsonca/booksofthebible

Answer 6

http://www.nccbuscc.org/nab/bible/index.htm

Each of the books has an introduction. Most of them discuss the writers.

Answer 7

you're kidding, right? Is it worth losing points to ask a question like this? Go think some more, hon.

Answer 8

no one knows who wrote them, the names were assigned as best as the people who complied them could guess

Answer 9

was'nt it the index or was it the glosory.