2007-02-01 09:23:38 · 8 answers · asked by JAMES 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
If an undercover cop were to wear a uniform, s/he wouldn't BE undercover.
Where they are is irrelevant.
2007-02-01 09:32:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Ok James I have to answer this in order to get the points. Cops would not be undercover if they wear uniforms. Glad you got off the ambulance issues. I guess we can expect more non-sensical questions about "Undercovers".
2007-02-02 07:43:59 · answer #2 · answered by Tom M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Say Jim, did you think about your question before posting it ? If a guy is wearing a uniform, he sure can't be undercover. Do you think that we could send one of our top spies into Russia wearing a US army officer's uniform?
2007-02-01 17:35:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Flushing Queens? If they have a uniform, then they are not undercovers. Either that or they are decoys for people that actually are. Plainclothes Detectives a.k.a. "Undercovers" wear plainclothes, so you can't distinguish them from normal people in stakeouts, or raids...etc
2007-02-01 17:32:44 · answer #4 · answered by Johnny O 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
JAMES - Why don't undercover cops wear uniforms in the shower??? Umm hmm! Don't make a whole lotta sense...does it? LMAO!
2007-02-05 01:25:42 · answer #5 · answered by Jennifer M 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
As usual James you are asking silly questions...
You are usually asking about ambulances though, so I'm kind of glad you've switched to a new topic.
2007-02-02 01:15:11 · answer #6 · answered by joeanonymous 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I thought if you were undercover people ought
not to know who the hell you are, so why are
you talking about undercovers, maybe you are
not even looking at one......................................
2007-02-02 10:10:37 · answer #7 · answered by gorglin 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is this a trick question? Bad troll, bad.
2007-02-01 18:31:03 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋