2007-02-01 08:22:17 · 13 answers · asked by COOKIE 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
after kissing up to us (Viet Nam) vets, she has gone back with her staff of political correct stooges, Hillery, Bill, Teddy to make another attempt to overthrow the clear thinking processes of the average domestic American voter. I for one would not want her near a tank, wait a second maybe in front slightly off center. here is a good read v-v-a-r.org
2007-02-01 12:37:02 · answer #1 · answered by whodad 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Let's just say that if Jane Fonda decides to take her war to Iraq, she may not make it out of there alive. The Vietnamese respected her presence their, but with the Arab world, they don't care if she is a woman or movie star. In fact, they will target her more since she is woman. They will perceive it as a insult, that a women is more powerful then they are. Why do you think that Hillary Clinton is cautious in going there.
2007-02-01 16:44:03 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Mui 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
if Jane Fonda were going to re-enact what She actually did in Vietnam She would have to somehow get in contact with Osama Bin Ladin and have some of His operatives escort Her secretly to His Cave for a Photo-Op.
That's what was so sinister about what She did in Vietnam. She actually collaberated with the enemy.
Going to Baghdad is one thing. Hell, people go there all the time with USO tours.
2007-02-01 16:30:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Not a good analogy, though. "Hanoi" was North Vietnamese. "Baghdad" is on the Iraqi (ally of the United States) side.
For the analogy to be correct, she would have to be on a gun of the Mahdi Army perhaps. Or some other side currently fighting the US. "Tehran Jane"?
2007-02-01 16:29:27 · answer #4 · answered by theearlybirdy 4 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Yes - anything that gets her to meet her maker sooner then later.
Her actions in Vietnam were beyond the pale. You would have thought she'd have learned her lessons - even if it were only for her to shut up. That would have been an improvement over what she had done in Vietnam.
And to think she blames the US for what happened after we withdrew from Vietnam. She and her buddies got what they wanted. And now she wants the same thing in Iraq??
2007-02-01 16:43:42 · answer #5 · answered by B C 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well one thing is for sure. Her apologies for her 1960s treason were nothing but lies. She was equating protesting Iraq to her protests in the 60s and saying she was right.
I'd like to see here go to Iraq and endorse the alquaeda there. After she was finished, they'd put her in a burkha and lead her off to their harem, never to be heard from again.
2007-02-01 16:29:31 · answer #6 · answered by bourbon_on_my_cornflakes 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Evidently " Tom Bollocks" is ignorant to the point you are making or just too young to know what you are talking about.
And as far as Baghdad....numerous of our soldiers have been killed there even though they are our 'ally'.
Baghdad would be just as well.....so one of OUR guys or gals could take her out!!! One shot....one kill.
2007-02-01 16:41:14 · answer #7 · answered by Sweetness 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Too bad the US warplanes didn't bomb her and her comrades while she posed for pictures on the communist anti-aircraft gun.
Maybe she'll go to Iraq and pose with some insurgents, and hold up an IED for pictures. That would be a good time for an F-16 to drop some napalm.
2007-02-01 16:25:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 1⤋
I would LMAO if she got the Nick Berg treatment. Ok, I'm not a sicko and I wouldn't laugh, but I really wouldn't be all that distraught.
2007-02-01 16:25:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
She'd be killed by the first jihadist who saw her. One shot right through the head.
2007-02-01 16:30:05 · answer #10 · answered by casey_leftwich 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋