Is Iran next in line?

Answer 1

Probably, the administration will think many a times before going into war against Iran as it is three times larger than Iraq and having population three times larger than that of Iraq which is very hostile to U.S. Considering that Iraq is still not won completely, wonder how much time and lives it takes to control Iran in full.

Answer 2

It's very likely that Iran is next, here's why:
Bush declared Iran among the Axis of Evil
Bush has sent a Battleship and support ships to the area
It's been reported that 4 US Nuclear Submarines are in that area
Iran continues to oppose the UN Sanctions by continuing it's nuclear ambitions
"Reports" of Israeli missions to bomb Iran were claimed by the Sunday Times in London (Israel is a US Ally)
Bush stated the US will not tolerate Iranian interference in Iraq
Iran is neighbor to Iraq which already hosts over 100,000 US troops (how convenient)
Bush only has less than two years in office, so this seems to be imminent
Congress understands the threat of a "nuclear" Iran, so despite what they "say", there's little they'll "do" to oppose the conflict
Iran's President is crazy enough pursue conflict with the US

Answer 3

Everyone in the media keeps suggesting that; however, the President already said 3 or 4 times now that even though everything stays on the table as a possibility, he has absolutely NO INTENTION of sending soldiers into Iran. He did add that since they are sending weapons to the militants in Iraq, that they will protect our military from harm. But they (he and congress) will not send anyone to Iran.

Answer 4

according to reports Iran are supplying weapons but these reports may be given by the ones that reported WMD's that lead America into this present war. It's also been reported that Iran is not involved so who really knows. I don't think Bush is going to take on another country seiing the one now has drawn such opposition but if so you'll see the draft start and 200000 troops being sent and all out fighting includeing here.

Answer 5

I believe that Iran is at the top of the Pentagon's wish list for a place to try out new weaponry. A neutered Iran will bring this whole middle east fiasco to a screeching halt!

Answer 6

No way, I don't think Bush will ever be trusted again to start another war. And if the dems had it their way, we would be pulling out of Iraq this instant, let alone not going to war with Iran. I say we let Israel take care of them...they won't last long.

Answer 7

We should let anyone who wants to annex the Iranian oilfields conquer and bankrupt this Persian Poison. For example, Pakistan or Russia would be willing and able to do this favor, which would benefit all mankind.

Answer 8

No.Iran,USA and Israel are just playing and cheating to divert what is going on in Iraq.I like that Iran will be next in line but this will not happen.

Answer 9

that is an user-friendly one. If the international receives too warm, we've shown that we may be able to live on it because the "Cradles of Civilization" were in warm, dry aspects. If the international receives chilly, then we've already shown that we may be able to face up to ice a at the same time as, and that is with out any "severe" technologies. If the international receives overpopulated, it is going to, out of necessity, stability itself out. i do not imagine we decide on to be stricken about surviving the subsequent one hundred years. the authentic question is a thanks to we save the subsequent one hundred years from growing the subsequent darkish Age.

Answer 10

Unfortunately yes - heaven forbid we actually deal with North Korea.