Is the Lexmark P450 a good photo printer or do you know a better one ? I want one that doesn't use a Pc and for less than £150 please.
2007-02-01 04:49:34 · 6 answers · asked by Rodman91 2 in Consumer Electronics ➔ Cameras
I agree - I would never think of a Lexmark for photographic purposes. The ink is very expensive also. Try a Canon Pixma, or one the the cheaper Epsons. I personally wouldn't go for an HP either. Go to PC world or somewhere similar to look - they usually have a good range at all prices.
2007-02-01 05:57:52 · answer #1 · answered by rdenig_male 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lexmark make horrible photo printers, the cartridges are too expensive and the quality is the pits.
A Canon such as an MP450 come complete with a pic bridge ,card reader and LCD screen. They are a full size printer and can do prints ranging from 4x6 - 8.5x11. and should be under $150
Currently canon and epson are leading the market in terms of high quality imaging.
2007-02-02 01:25:27 · answer #2 · answered by smedrik 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
photograph taken for the period of WW II exhibits all around st Paul's burning and then the wonderful dome displaying above the rubble. The British human beings labored stressful to save ST Paul's and Prince Charles and Princess Diana have been given married there in 1981.
2016-11-02 01:33:19 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lexmark is not a good make.
2007-02-01 05:00:02 · answer #4 · answered by smithy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
all printers are fairly good
we need to know what you will use it for
2007-02-01 06:42:51 · answer #5 · answered by Elvis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ef
2007-02-01 04:56:31 · answer #6 · answered by kkkkkkkkkkevin 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋