Are the findings of fossils of aquatic animals on top of Himalyas an evidence for Great Flood or an evidence of Plate Tectonics by Alfred Wegner
2007-02-01 03:36:13 · 8 answers · asked by Born again atheist 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Here is it http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plate_tectonic
2007-02-01 03:40:10 · update #1
Plate tectonics. Proof of the great flood would be a consistent layer of sediment across the entire world dating to the same age. It probably would not have the same chemical make up in all regions but it should be identifable as being deposited at the same time. There should also be a consitent level of fossils of the flora and fauna of the time period.
2007-02-01 03:41:48 · answer #1 · answered by Pirate AM™ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Science: Plate Tectonics!
Superstitious Myth: Great Flood.
2007-02-01 11:39:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Great Flood. You know dirt never falls up. It always falls down. So if the plates move here and there moving the fossils in the ground how would the aquatic animals get on top of a mountain? That's impossible.
2007-02-01 12:01:56 · answer #3 · answered by Alien51 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Plate Tectonics!
2007-02-01 14:32:43 · answer #4 · answered by The Tourist 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Plate tectonics. There is not enough O2 on earth to combine with H to make enough water to cover the globe to a depth that great. PERIOD, end of argument.
2007-02-01 11:39:01 · answer #5 · answered by YDoncha_Blowme 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I am form India, I have not heard anything about finding of fossils of aquatic animals on top of himalayas, they routienly find dead bodies of missing mountanaires but not any fossils
2007-02-01 11:42:28 · answer #6 · answered by ramy 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well there is alot of humadity in Himalyas.
Beside, usually there is water in moutains thats why you see falls and stuff.
2007-02-01 11:50:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
cited reference needed
2007-02-01 11:37:53 · answer #8 · answered by Sean 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋