English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

They are a huge supported of terrorism.

2007-02-01 02:56:06 · 14 answers · asked by Jo 4 in Politics & Government Military

14 answers

Ah hell, why not. It could be a hoot and a holler.

2007-02-01 02:59:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

It has always been part of Mr. Bush's plans to go to war with Iran, Syria, Jordan and subsequently Saudi Arabia. The essence of fighting hezbollah in Lebanon was to curtail any repraisal attack against Israel should in case US invades Iran. But the war turns out to be a big miscalculation. The rapist and sex starving Israeli generals and politicians couldn't come up with a good military strategy and that alone frustrated the whole plan. Thank God that happened, ortherwise the whole world would have been thrown into confusion and anarchy by this rapists and farcists.

2007-02-01 12:09:16 · answer #2 · answered by MAFOKOCHIZHI 2 · 0 3

We're not going after Iran.

That's something the media drummed up to keep ratings high.

Iran is having political turmoil right now and Ahmedinijad lacks the political will or capability to conduct any kind of conflict. The country is in an economical crisis and the clerics are in revolt of his policies. Not to mention he's pretty much ticked off all the people 25 and younger in that country.

I wouldn't lose any sleep over it, if I were you...

2007-02-01 11:02:09 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 2 1

There would need to be a direct provocation by Iran for us to go to war with them....by that, I mean a direct attack.
Frankly, that entire area would be better off as a radioactive heap.

2007-02-01 10:59:53 · answer #4 · answered by bradxschuman 6 · 4 1

I believe that Bush has plans to go to war with the whole of the middle east eventually

2007-02-01 10:58:10 · answer #5 · answered by Boofie 6 · 5 2

And maybe North Korea as well.

But seeing as how the US military can barely deal with insurgents in Iraq, I think facing a professional army, such as Iran's, is out of the question.

2007-02-01 10:59:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

I wish that we can. My anlysis is the lack of manpower. We have less 1 miilion personnel in the service.

2007-02-01 11:00:50 · answer #7 · answered by c1523456 6 · 0 1

All this is predicted in the Holy Bible... Read Revelations.

2007-02-01 12:32:37 · answer #8 · answered by TaylorProud 5 · 2 2

WE MIGHT AS WELL SEND THEM ALL INTO THE STONE AGE. THAT WAY WE DON'T HAVE TO GO BACK FOR A HUNDRED YEARS.

2007-02-01 10:59:52 · answer #9 · answered by strike_eagle29 6 · 3 1

Bush won't be happy until he brings on armageddon. After all, it would be the neo cons wet dream come true.

2007-02-01 11:02:53 · answer #10 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers