Here are some pretty intelligent arguements against evolution,well worth checking out.
www.epm.org/articles/
evolution.html
What is your response to this?
2007-02-01 01:52:14 · 8 answers · asked by Sentinel 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I like this. There is plenty of proof out for creation. It takes an Atheist Zelot to deny it.
2007-02-01 01:58:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Whats the use about arguing over something that is incomplete.
The theory of evolution is not a complete one.
It has many different facets and different arguments and points where answers are clearly just not there because of the lack of information.
Did you hear about the human form skeletons they discovered in Indonesia?
That on its own has sparked so much debate among scientists its simply amusing.
All we should do is just let the scientists do their thing, and wait and see if everything can be proven the way the theories proclaim.
2007-02-01 01:58:10 · answer #2 · answered by Antares 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
lies and distortions again. i thought Christianity was supposed to be the moral high ground.
all of these have been dealt with long ago.
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/index.html
but number 9 was a down right lie. firstly evolution does not deal with the origin of life, but the evolutionary process, (ignorance or distortion). and 'spontaneous generation of life was a medieval theory no modern scientist has ever held with it (again a display of either ignorance or downright lies)..
http://www.accessexcellence.org/RC/AB/BC/Spontaneous_Generation.html
2007-02-01 02:19:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are only *two* arguments against evolution:
"I am too stubborn to accept it"
and
"I am not intelligent enough to understand it"
Any argument against it, just like any argument against gravity, turns out to be one or the other.
2007-02-01 01:58:04 · answer #4 · answered by eldad9 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
O wait I accessed it.
Well, all I have to say is that these "arguments" are bland statements that have been refuted or seem to contradict the argument itself at times, and so, I simply say: Please take Biology 101.
2007-02-01 01:56:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sophistry.
2007-02-01 01:55:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
All have been refuted so many times, it's a waste of space.
2007-02-01 01:55:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
pretty lame effort my friend, the site lacks credibilty
2007-02-01 01:58:04 · answer #8 · answered by Jason Bourne 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋