Did man evolve again with the coming of Our Lord?
2007-01-31 23:44:14 · 12 answers · asked by ? 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
With all the killing it does not look like it,plus greed and hatred
2007-02-01 00:25:52 · answer #1 · answered by woodsonhannon53 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There is plenty of easy to understand evidence that man did evolve. Here is a list
* Fossils - the order can be determined by stratification alone (no radiological dating) it is unarguable and life started simple and got more complex. Here is a simple chart to show what I mean: http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/fossils/succession.html
* Anatomical similarities between species.
* Chemical similarities between species.
* Mitochondrial DNA regressive studies. - This comes only from your mother and the only changes to it are through mutations. These mutations occur at a known rate, and converge world wide 150,000 years ago give or take. If Eve (6000 years ago) was the only female, it would be almost identical world wide. It is not. The flood gives a second bottleneck that matches the facts even less well.
* Geographic distribution of related species. Meaning related species are usually near each other.
* Wisdom Teeth - there isn't room on your jaw for them anymore.
* Your little toe - totally useless. Nice intellegent design here.
* Your appendix - totally useless now but it does digest cellulose in other species.
* Your inner eyelids - They don't even work now, but they do for lots of other animals like house cats. Bet you didn't even know you had 'em.
* Vestigial DNA - meaning chromosomes that we have but don't use, but that used in other species. We have several that other primates use but are totally useless to us.
* The fact that we share so much DNA among species
* There are no wild cows. They evolved through artificial selection and are totally man made.
* Different breeds of dogs, cats, livestock.
* Viruses and bacteria evolve quickly and you can actually see it. This is why you need a new flu shot every year.
* Your tail bone. It is even not that uncommon to be born with a tail.
* Goosebumps - this would be useful if we had fur because it fluffs it and make more insulation. For us it is worthless.
* The hair standing up on your neck when you are frightened. Animals use this to make themselves look bigger. Doesn't work when you walk upright and don't have fur.
* The fact that humans have gotten measurably and heritablely taller since the 1600s
* The fact that humans jaw have gotten measurably and heritablely smaller since the 1600s
* The fact that humans little toes have gotten measurably and heritablely smaller since the 1600s
* Human lower back problems. Your back is intelligently designed to have support from your shoulders.
2007-01-31 23:52:37 · answer #2 · answered by Alex 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Darwinism's common descent has now been proven with the unscrambling of the genome, we all share genes with the banana and bacteria. The other part of Darwinism is natural selection and Darwin's finches in the Galapagos have been studied for decades now, countless studies in the field and laboratory have shown Darwin to be right, he is not in danger of being shown to be wrong...this plus the fossil record as evidence means that man evolved as did all other creatures on Earth but there is no evidence for Jesus that is any more than hearsay so I don't think he had anything to do with anything much and was probably a fictional character.
2007-01-31 23:55:42 · answer #3 · answered by CHEESUS GROYST 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Man did not evolved from monkeys. Genesis 1 clearly stated that God created humans and monkeys are not the ancestors of humans. Man never evolved.
2007-02-01 01:50:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no lord. God is imaginary.
Man not only did evolve, but we continue to do so.
2007-01-31 23:45:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
And, as stated by using one remark on the daily Mail's internet site: this text is thoroughly faulty! a right away quote from the learn: "between adult men of decrease socioeconomic status (SES), potential envisioned bigger help for redistribution; between adult men of better SES, potential envisioned bigger opposition to redistribution". this would not advise that better adult men are greater possibly to be conservative! It says sturdy wealthy adult men are greater possibly to be conservative (shocker!), together as vulnerable center-type and poor adult men are greater possibly to be conservative. in line with threat the author could have genuinely examine the object she cites. The daily Mail is form of the Fox information of London, so this sort of faulty reporting is to be envisioned, as is copying of the object by using good-wing approaches in the U.S.
2016-11-23 19:51:03 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Theory of Evolutions has volumes upon volumes of FACTS to back it up.
Religion has a book or two and blind faith!
2007-02-01 00:28:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no man revolved
2007-01-31 23:46:50 · answer #8 · answered by Lancelot 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
yeah they say there are two species now...one is going to heaven & the other to hell...
2007-01-31 23:46:56 · answer #9 · answered by Urban Hermit 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
When you say our, do you mean.. you, and me? AHAHAHA
2007-01-31 23:46:48 · answer #10 · answered by The_Answerer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋