English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

by him and the leader of Iran. What are your thoughts.

2007-01-31 15:22:59 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

7 answers

He has already had official and unofficial meeting with Iranian. I think he is turning a blind eye to the weapons and fighters coming in from Iran. Dosen't matter we will be having an air invasion or Iran soon. No invasion just wipe out their military, nuclear developments and knock em back 30 years.

2007-01-31 15:27:36 · answer #1 · answered by Nate H 2 · 0 0

there we go the side effects of the Iraq war majority of Shiites are sympathetic to Iranians for the help they got from Iran when being tortured by Saddam America doesn't understand that thats America's problem the same goes to Pakistan even though the pak govt is fighting taliban the intell organizations have had a long friendship with taliban and will never easily turn their backs on them so what iranians has done a lot good to iraqi shiites before the war started even with iran trying to destabilise the war for america the relation is still as strong between iran and iraqi shiites as before and maliki's govt is only up there because of majority shia support if he does somethin wrong the govt will collapse easily without the much needed majority shia and kurd support and america will not be able to do a thing about that

2007-01-31 23:53:13 · answer #2 · answered by YR1947 4 · 0 0

First of all, Maliki was put in power by Al Sadr and his militias. So, there's no way that Maliki can disarm them. Maliki owes them his hold to power. Al Sadr's militias have the financial and material backing of Iran. While Maliki is paying lip-service to cooperate with Bush's dictates, he is in close contact with the Iranian president. Is Maliki double dealing, or is he just trying to be diplomatic with Iran and Syria?. Nobody really knows, but what he's doing will surely be for his own political survival.

2007-02-01 07:10:35 · answer #3 · answered by roadwarrior 4 · 0 0

i think you have a very good point.he ca not be relied on to end the sectarian violence between factions or against the us military.
iraq is being controlled by iran and is fighting a proxy war against the usa.
iran is a long standing enemy,going right back to 1979 when hundreds of people were taken hostage in teheran and 1983 when hundreds so called peace keeping marines were truck bombed and killed in beirut.
iran has openly stated its intentions and no one is listening.
war with iran is already happening but before george w leaves office there will be action taken.note the 2 aircraftcarriers in the area already.

2007-01-31 23:35:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yeah! He is definitely siding with the Shites against the Sunni. And if you think there is a blood bath going on over there now. You haven't seen nothing yet. Just wait until we pull out and there will be a blood bath like you would not believe between the Sunni and Shites. It will make the 100 year's war between the Catholics and Protestants look like a Sunday school picnic.

2007-01-31 23:34:39 · answer #5 · answered by JUAN FRAN$$$ 7 · 0 0

He is a fraud, but the military knows what it is doing, they are just not allowed to do it.

2007-01-31 23:25:29 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

The Bush administration backed him to win and put him there, they know exactly what is going on, it has been planned that way from the beginning.

2007-01-31 23:31:00 · answer #7 · answered by 33 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers