Chemistry is something that'll hold the relationship together. Don't worry though, if you get with a partner, chemistry will build through time.
2007-01-31 15:14:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
you at the instant are not on my own; i've got additionally had problems dealing with the chemical equations, on an identical time as physics and maths made up for the undesirable grade in chemistry. Your ideal wager may well be physics, apart from the reality which you dislike the electrical powered and electronics area of it. you're comfortable with Mechanical engineering in case you have not have been given undertaking with technical drawing and learn of fabric. Civil engineering too could tournament you (Structural area), in case you have not have been given problems with Mechanics (Engineering mechanics).
2016-12-13 05:50:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you are looking for a romantic relationship then chemistry is a must.
2007-01-31 15:14:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by sweetgirl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh yes there must be sparks, feeling things in your lover, having your lover understand your needs before you do youself. Ah this is love
2007-01-31 15:14:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by smilingtalker_au 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Chemistry does not apply to emotion's. I guess not
2007-01-31 15:14:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by NB 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
well it matters how good you are at measuring moles of a hydrochloride acid vs the energy of 2 atoms of glamertonicide in volume so... if you dont have that with your partner, dont even bother handing in this weeks assignment.
2007-01-31 15:16:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by radiokiller 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you do have to have chemistry. If not, how can you have passion and that is important.
2007-01-31 15:13:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by mamabear 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
just enough chemistry to cause the initial reaction.... everything beyond that is what you work to make of it.
2007-01-31 15:17:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by going_crazy_30m 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
you don't need it, but it adds a spark to the relationship
2007-01-31 15:20:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Andrew 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
defenitly
2007-01-31 15:13:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by gil2200 1
·
0⤊
0⤋