English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

* Gnostic: The Gospel of Thomas
* Gnostic: The Secret Book of James
* Gnostic: Basilides
* Gnostic: Naassene Fragment
* Gnostic: Gospel of Mary
* Gnostic: Dialogue of the Savior
* Gnostic: Gospel of the Savior
* Gnostic: Marcion
* Gnostic: Epiphanes
* Gnostic: Ophite Diagrams
* Gnostic: Ptolemy
* Gnostic: Gospel of Truth
* Gnostic: Excerpts of Theodotus
* Gnostic: Heracleon
* Gnostic: Acts of Peter
* Gnostic: Acts of Thomas

Any thoughts???

2007-01-31 13:40:40 · 7 answers · asked by Jessi 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Who has read the Gnostic Gospels???

2007-01-31 13:49:55 · update #1

7 answers

The Gospel of Thomas Is one of my favorites.

It sounds a lot more like Jesus than most of the stuff in the bible.

Funny how see the light says she never read any of them yet she knows all about them.

If you used her time line theory, None of Paul's letters or revelations or the gospels of Mathew Mark Luke and John would have made it into the bible.

love and blessings Don

2007-01-31 14:01:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Yes all of those. And especially the Pistis Sophia which is the gnostic bible.

Well said Don. And it has actually been demonstrated that none of the synoptic gospels were written by the claimed authors, and also that Paul only wrote 2-3 of the books attributed to him. Furthermore, many scholars believe Thomas is actually older than anything in the NT. The NT is a false representation and corruption of the real teachings of Jesus & his consort Mary. We now have an alternative source of teaching and the NT no longer holds the monopoly.

2007-01-31 13:58:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I have a replica of the Nag Hammadi at homestead, and a separate version of the Gospel of Thomas. there's a sturdy reason this stuff were no longer blanketed and one can not say without some verification that they are the right ones and the Bible is incorrect. they supply an attractive perception into the offshoot sects of early Christianity, in spite of the undeniable fact that.

2016-10-17 04:27:07 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I've read a few of the Gnostic Gospels but haven't finished them. I'm trying to read "Ptolemy's Letter To Flora" but haven't gotten to it yet. They are different, to say the least.

2007-01-31 14:39:18 · answer #4 · answered by Da Mick 5 · 1 0

i flipped thru them once found them boring and idiotic i read that in one of the gnostic gospels it said jesus didnt die on the cross he only looked like he was dead but couldnt die cause he was a magic spirit beig or something that influinced mohammed when he wrote the quran he knew of that story and it appears in the quran same as the story of the baby jesus making toys come alive its weird myths and legends

2007-02-01 02:40:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Poorly written, inconsistent, badly preserved, interesting but of no deep faith value.

2007-01-31 15:50:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I have not read all of them. There is a reason why they are accepted in the Bible. They are not reliable sources and they are written so long after Jesus' time that they do not pass the time line.

2007-01-31 14:00:51 · answer #7 · answered by SeeTheLight 7 · 1 5

fedest.com, questions and answers